User talk:RedactedSagan

Dallas Brodie

Hello RedactedSagan,

Please do not remove properly cited and contextual information from articles without providing an explanation in the edit summary or offering a reliable counter-source. Unexplained removals of sourced content may be considered disruptive editing. If you disagree with the material, please discuss it on the article’s talk page instead. TimeToFixThis | 🕒 00:55, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I did put an explanation on the talk page. But thanks for reaching out. RedactedSagan (talk) 02:30, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello User:RedactedSagan,

Stop removing properly cited and contextual information from the article. This content has reliable sourcing and has already been discussed. Continued removal without consensus is considered an edit war, which is against Wikipedia policy WP:Editwarring. If you continue to make these changes without discussion, I will have no choice but to involve an administrator, which could result in a block or ban. Please take any disagreements to this talk page so we can work toward consensus. Thank you. TimeToFixThis | 🕒 05:03, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Then engage with me on the talk page. I put the rationale for why this line is not relevant or at the very least provides insufficient context. Something can be both accurate and cherry picked. The relevant context on this page is the statements and controversy around Dallas Brodie, not a full accounting of the complexities of estimating the death toll of residential schools. Adding one line to support Brodie without other context violates the article's neutrality. So please, let's hash this out on the talk page. Where I will note concerns about the article's neutrality started before my edit. RedactedSagan (talk) 13:54, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It is also pretty aggressive to start an edit war and then post this directly on my talk page. The WP that you linked to specifically talked about this behaviour. It's also disappointing to see this done in service of residential school denialism. RedactedSagan (talk) 21:29, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ANI-notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Edit warring and possible sockpuppetry by User:RedactedSagan. TimeToFixThis | 🕒 08:23, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In the future, please just talk to people that you have a disagreement with. There was no reason to escalate this to the ANI. Now that you are engaging on Dallas Brodie's talk page, we can have a discussion about how to best represent a sensitive topic. This is how disagreements should be handled. Treat people with respect when they are trying to engage in a discussion. RedactedSagan (talk) 17:40, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, RedactedSagan!

I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help. Has a list of maintenance tasks you can do.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue on the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Sarsenet•he/they•(talk) 13:54, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Sarsenet! I really appreciate it! RedactedSagan (talk) 21:00, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Heads up

There is currently a request for comment going on at Talk:Dallas Brodie; you are welcome to discuss there. Also, there is a sockpuppet investigation open on you, at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ RedactedSagan. You are free to defend yourself in the 'Comments by other users' section. I figured you should be notified of it. Best, 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) 02:16, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! RedactedSagan (talk) 04:13, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]