User talk:Questfeather

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jason Mershon (October 17)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AlphaBetaGamma was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
"in popular culture" has no citations. Why does "online dating" have an external link? Please wikilink it instead, since it leads to a wikipedia article. Several potentially controversial claims are not sourced, like "The newspaper remained a successful business for twenty-five years, however, with the advent of the internet and proliferation of video and online dating services in the 1990’s, the National Singles Register published its last issue in 1996."
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 12:38, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Questfeather! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 12:38, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jason Mershon (March 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spinster300 was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Spinster300 (talk) 09:32, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]