User talk:Presleyconnor
| This is Presleyconnor's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Kevin Donahue (June 15)
[edit]
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kevin Donahue and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, Presleyconnor!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MCE89 (talk) 08:02, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Kevin Donahue (June 17)
[edit]This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Unfortunately, I don't see anything in this draft indicating that Donahue fulfils the criteria in WP:ANYBIO or WP:POLITICIAN. Please familiarise yourself with these pages before amending the draft. If you feel you can meet these requirements, then please make the necessary amendments before resubmitting the page. It would help our volunteer reviewers by identifying, on the draft's talk page, the WP:THREE best sources that establish notability of the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Also, if you have any connection to the subject, including being the subject (see WP:AUTOBIO) or being paid, you have a conflict of interest that you must declare on your Talk page (to see instructions on how to do this please click the link).
It would also be helpful if you could please identify with specificity, exactly which criteria you believe the page meets (eg "I think the page now meets WP:NACTOR criteria #3, because XXXXX").- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kevin Donahue and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
- Hi!
- Thank you for reviewing and providing feedback on Draft: Kevin Donahue! I was hoping you could help me improve by addressing some questions I have.
- First, the conflict of interest… I added it to my user page – at least I think! - at the beginning of my article creation. Does it need to be on the talk page, as you indicated, instead? If so, I’ll try to remedy using the link you provided!
- On the notability side - I think this page meets the WP:POLITICIAN because Donahue holds state-wide office, as indicated in bullet one. It’s a little confusing because Washington, DC does not have official statehood, but for all intents and purposes, DC operates as a state, making its political figures state officers. Is that a reasonable explanation in your experience?
- I also wanted to thank you for the tip on WP:THREE. I will definitely pull out the sources to make things a bit easier on the volunteer reviewers in the future.
- Again, thank you! I really appreciate your review! Presleyconnor (talk) 20:24, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
[edit]
|
Hello Presleyconnor! The thread you created at the Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
See also the help page about the archival process.
The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing |