User talk:PrStato
Welcome!
[edit]Hi PrStato! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Jay8g [V•T•E] 06:01, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
August 2025
[edit]
Hello, I'm Donald Albury. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Heterotroph, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. As far as I know, all animals are heterotrophs. If you were thinking of Euglena and such, they are protists, not animals. Donald Albury 18:55, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
- I added the citations. PrStato (talk) 19:20, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
- (Some are mixotrophs, which don’t count as heterotrophs because “A heterotroph (/ˈhɛtərəˌtroʊf, -ˌtrɒf/; from Ancient Greek ἕτερος (héteros), meaning "other", and τροφή (trophḗ), meaning "nourishment") is an organism that CANNOT produce its own food” and mixotrophs can). PrStato (talk) 19:23, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Clivunellidae
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Clivunellidae requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it exhibits one or more of the following signs which indicate that the page could only plausibly have been generated by large language models (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology) and would have been removed by any reasonable human review:
- Communication intended for the user: This may include collaborative communication (e.g., "Here is your Wikipedia article on..."), knowledge-cutoff disclaimers (e.g., "Up to my last training update ..."), self-insertion (e.g., "as a large language model"), and phrasal templates (e.g., "Smith was born on [Birth Date].")
- Implausible non-existent references: This may include external links that are dead on arrival, ISBNs with invalid checksums, and unresolvable DOIs. Since humans can make typos and links may suffer from link rot, a single example should not be considered definitive. Editors should use additional methods to verify whether a reference truly does not exist.
- Nonsensical citations: This may include citations of incorrect temporality (e.g a source from 2020 being cited for a 2022 event), DOIs that resolve to completely unrelated content (e.g., a paper on a beetle species being cited for a computer science article), and citations that attribute the wrong author or publication.
Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Pages created using them that did not undergo human review may be deleted at any time.
If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find creating new encyclopedia content yourself difficult, please share this with other editors at the Teahouse, and they may be able to help. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your legitimate contributions. SunloungerFrog (talk) 05:46, 1 September 2025 (UTC)
Clivunellidae
[edit] Hello, I'm SunloungerFrog. An edit that you recently made to Clivunellidae seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.
In the Clivunellidae article, please will you explain where you get the statement Fossils of Clivunella have been discovered in Miocene deposits of paleolakes within the Dinaride Lake System in southeastern Europe. This family is believed to have evolved exclusively within that ancient lake system
from? The Hydrobiologia article does not mention Clivunella or Clivunellidae at all. If you are using a large language model to generate article content, please don't. LLMs often hallucinate content and sources, and their output must be scrutinised carefully to check that (a) the sources exist and (b) they verify statements made in the article content. Cheers, SunloungerFrog (talk) 05:09, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
September 2025
[edit]
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Clivunella, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Criticize (talk) 21:17, 2 September 2025 (UTC)
Hello PrStato, Good day. Please note that the editor who adds or changes (including re-adding unsourced content)the content of the articles needs to provide an independent, reliable source for verification - please read WP:BURDEN. Please do not add the info back without the supporting source. Thank you. Cassiopeia talk 21:55, 2 September 2025 (UTC)