User talk:Norden1990

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13

Proposed deletion of Pirate Party of Hungary

The article Pirate Party of Hungary has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources on the page, nor is the party relevant enough to warrant an article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Kačić has been nominated for renaming

Category:Kačić has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 17:58, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Secretum Secretorum

Hi, this can be interesting for you!

https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_Secretum_Secretorum_(The_Secret_of_Secrets)_-_Louis_the_Great_of_Hungary.jpg

https://sites.hertford.ox.ac.uk/library-archives/secretum/ OrionNimrod (talk) 23:43, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! --Norden1990 (talk) 07:57, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Geőcze family has been nominated for deletion

Category:Geőcze family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ^SMason_Garrison 01:02, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Rhédey family has been nominated for deletion

Category:Rhédey family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ^SMason_Garrison 01:06, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Lépes family has been nominated for deletion

Category:Lépes family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ^SMason_Garrison 01:06, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Kisfaludy family has been nominated for deletion

Category:Kisfaludy family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ^SMason_Garrison 01:07, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Albeni family has been nominated for deletion

Category:Albeni family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ^SMason_Garrison 01:24, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Are2The2

Hi Norden!

I think it would be worth to check the strange edits of this user, some examples:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Religion_in_Hungary&diff=prev&oldid=1287217051

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=History_of_Hungary&diff=prev&oldid=1286880108 OrionNimrod (talk) 19:32, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

At first glance, I don't see the user's edits as problematic, but if there is a content edit that is questionable, it should be resolved on the talk page. --Norden1990 (talk) 20:46, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Szilágyi

Szia! Szerinted erdélyi vajda volt? https://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Szilágyi_Mihály_(kormányzó)

https://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erdélyi_vajda

Voivode of Transylvania#List of voivodes OrionNimrod (talk) 15:08, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Az 1458–1526. közötti archontológiai adattár szerint erdélyi kormányzó volt 1460-ban. De mindeközben a vajdai tisztség is be volt töltve, tehát a válasz: nem. --Norden1990 (talk) 18:15, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mit jelent az hogy erdélyi kormányzó? Forrásod van erről? OrionNimrod (talk) 19:19, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Szilágyi Mihályról máig az egyetlen monográfia: [1]. Korai pályafutásával kapcsolatban nemrég felmerültek kételyek: [2]. --Norden1990 (talk) 08:33, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Köszi! OrionNimrod (talk) 08:53, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Norden1990. Thank you for your work on Stephen II Gutkeled. Another editor, Scope creep, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Big wall of text needs subsections.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Scope creep}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

scope_creep^Talk 16:09, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Scope creep:, done. --Norden1990 (talk) 19:30, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nice one @Norden1990: You have been working like a beaver. That is great. Excellent wee article on a super obscure individual. Much better. scope_creep^Talk 19:34, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! --Norden1990 (talk) 20:27, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:KovacsBela1908.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:KovacsBela1908.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rerum Hungaricarum decades

Hi, as start, feedbacks and extension are welcome! Rerum Hungaricarum decades OrionNimrod (talk) 13:30, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

After Nov 2025, this most valuable academic work on Bonfini's chronicle will become public domain. Anyway, Péter Kulcsár's studies are the best summaries in the preface or afterword of each edition. --Norden1990 (talk) 17:56, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info! OrionNimrod (talk) 19:25, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

They copied your article! Great! https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gesta_Hungarorum_vetera OrionNimrod (talk) 12:43, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And that's not the only one fortunately. --Norden1990 (talk) 13:12, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I experienced this even with my written articles OrionNimrod (talk) 13:37, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, weird edits [3] OrionNimrod (talk) 13:24, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Norden, what is your opinion about this date? It is ok? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Matthias_Corvinus&curid=272105&diff=1301203253&oldid=1300154635 OrionNimrod (talk) 19:14, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@OrionNimrod:, yes, he was crowned on 29 March 1464, based on the modern medieval chronology published in 2023. --Norden1990 (talk) 20:32, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The World Destubathon

Hello. You're invited to participate in The World Destubathon. We're aiming to destub a lot of articles and also improve longer stale articles. It will be held from Monday June 16 - Sunday July 13. There is over $3300 going into it, with $500 the top prize. If you are interested in winning something to save you money in buying books for future content, or just see it as a good editathon opportunity to see a lot of articles improved for subjects which interest you, sign up on the page in the participants section if interested. Even if you can only manage a few articles they would be very much appreciated and help towards making the content produced as diverse and broad as possible!♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:03, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hungarian Revolution of 1848

Szia, hosszú hallgatás után készen állok, hogy a szabadságharc katonai történetét röviden megírjam a főcikkbe. Tehát úgy gondolom, hogy azt, aminek nincs helye ott, azt kitörlöm, és, áttekinthető módon, röviden, beteszem azt, amiről szólnia kell: hadseregszervezést, hadjáratokat, csatákat. Rendben van-e így? A nem publikált hosszú, részletes szabadságharc története cikket pedig időszak, régió szerint részekre bontva, külön-külön publikálom, hivatkozásokkal a főcikkbe. A kérdésem az, hogy ezeket nem lehetne-e, az avatatlan trollok számára ugyanúgy korlátozni, mint a főcikket? Sylvain1975 (talk) 16:30, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Szia, amíg nincs konfliktus, sajnos nem, mert a Wiki szabad lexikon. Örülök, hogy végül publikálod, mert ezek nagyon értékes szerkesztések (valamelyest elkezdtem átnézni nyelvtanilag stb., csak sajnos nekem is behatárolt az időm). --Norden1990 (talk) 21:03, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Szia, már három 48 szabadságharcos cikket készítettem.

1. A régebbi, leghosszabbat (99 A4 oldal), amelyet hadjáratonként (őszi, téli, tavaszi, nyári) és előzmények és következményekként (a hadsereg megszervezése, fegyverletétel, a szabadságharc utóélete) külön cikkekre fogok felbontani és közzétenni.

2. Egy, ennek a negyedénél kissé nagyobb összefogó cikket (27 A4 oldal), amelyet egy, csak a szabadságharc katonai történetét bemutató külön cikknek ('Hungarian War of Independence of 1848-1849') szánok.

3. A legújabb (9 A4 oldalas), amelyet a 'Hungarian Revolution of 1848' cikk katonai részének szánok. Ezt úgy gondolom, hogy az eredeti cikk 'Austrians' és 'Russians' alcímeit törlöm, mert azok, zagyván és falsul, próbálták a szabadságharc néhány mozzanatát bemutatni. Helyettük lenne ez a cikk, amely a magyar hadsereg megalakulását és a szabadságharcot mutatja be röviden, időrendi sorrendben.

Később a nemzetiségek rész valótlanságait is ki kellene szerkeszteni a cikkből.

Mit gondolsz erről? Sylvain1975 (talk) 16:29, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Egyetértek. A nemzetiségi résznél azért nézd meg, mi az, ami tartható, a szlovák, román stb. álláspontnak is meg kell jelennie, különben állandó szerkesztési háború lesz a vége. --Norden1990 (talk) 20:01, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Szia, a román, szlovák, szerb, horvát részt egyelőre meghagyjuk. Csak az orosz és osztrák részt szedem ki, és helyébe a szabadságharc részletes bemutatását teszem. Az előbbiekkel később majd meglátjuk. Sylvain1975 (talk) 14:45, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete

Hi Norden! I see you created this, I think it is redundant and we could delete it as we have own articles with date Battle of Isaszeg. Many battles, sieges happened in the same location, but I do not see a group article like that, battle Lechfeld 910+955, siege Belgrade 1440+1456+1521 etc. What do you think? OrionNimrod (talk) 13:36, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is a disambiguation page, similar to Siege of Belgrade, Sack of Rome etc. --Norden1990 (talk) 20:11, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cumans

I added a proper description, those are not the Cumans https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cumans_in_Hungary.jpg OrionNimrod (talk) 13:50, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comment, I removed the image. However, the image is also incorrectly listed in the List of wars involving Hungary article. --Norden1990 (talk) 14:12, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It also listed incorrect in many other foreign articles. I will propose a file rename, in Chronicon Pictum that image is part of the clan pages in 10th century, page 32. From page 194 https://vilagbiztonsag.hu/keptar/albums/userpics/10009/kalti_mark_kepes_kronikaja.pdf OrionNimrod (talk) 14:14, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ladislaus, bishop(s) of Vác

Hi! I noticed your recent creation Ladislaus (bishop of Vác). I was about to mark the article as reviewed but wanted to quickly verify everything. In doing so, I stumbled on Ladislaus Szalkai, who is claimed to have been a 16th-century bishop of Vác. At the minimum, I think we need to alter the disambiguation for your new article. However, I'm having trouble verifying that either man was a bishop of Vác. The classic stand-by of Catholic-Hierarchy (a useful albeit deprecated and problematic resource) mentions neither. If you have the ability to share quotes or any accessible links that support either man's episcopate, I think it would greatly improve either article. Thanks for your good work! Best, ~ Pbritti (talk) 22:02, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Both of them were bishops of Vác based on modern archontologies. However, these are offline works. For Ladislaus Szalkai: [4], for the 13th-century Ladislaus: [5] ("László (†1293?)"). --Norden1990 (talk) 22:24, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent—that's all good to go there! The only issue remaining that we should probably move Ladislaus (bishop of Vác) to something that disambiguates him from the other Ladislaus who was bishop of Vác. Since his death date is uncertain, that sort of rules that out. Any thoughts? ~ Pbritti (talk) 23:29, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have placed a disambiguation template at the beginning of the article. --Norden1990 (talk) 08:11, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:25, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Rogwa Wodrata" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Rogwa Wodrata has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 August 29 § Rogwa Wodrata until a consensus is reached. TNstingray (talk) 12:16, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hungarian War of Independence of 1848-1849

Szia, a tegnap draftba helyezték a szóban forgó átfogó cikkemet, hogy úgymond elég lesz a Hungarian Revolution of 1848 cikkben levő rövidebb leírás. Én a cikk alatt megírtam a véleményemet, hogy ez nem helyes, és hogy valóban jó lenne egy kis átalakítás a Revolution cikkben, például kiszedni onnan a katonai részeket, mert az nem tartozik a forradalomhoz, visszatenni a draftból a szabadságharc cikket és ott is csak a hadjáratok (nyári, tavaszi, stb.) megalakítandó infoboxait tenni annak infoboxába, és mikor közlésre kerül aa többi hadjárat, azokban lebontva beletenni minden csatát ütközetet oda, ahova azok tartoznak. Kérlek, te is írd meg a véleményedet a Revolution cikk alá erről. Köszi.

Sylvain1975 (Sylvain1975 💬) 10:32, 02 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sylvain1975, the problem you talked a lot earlier about those things privat in many user talks, all of us should talk about this in the relevant talk page where everybody can see and can make a comment. Talk:Hungarian Revolution of 1848#Article split proposal: Hungarian Revolution 1848 (March 1848) + Hungarian War of Indepence 18484-49 (June 1848 - October 1849) OrionNimrod (talk) 09:01, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thury

Hi, I see you usually do people articles, maybe he can be a good candidate as there is no English page https://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thury_György OrionNimrod (talk) 13:12, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Unfortunately, I don't have much time to edit lately. --Norden1990 (talk) 20:38, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

Thank you for the clarification of ispán! I appreciate the time you took to explain the nuances. Cairobinz (talk) 13:38, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wars

Hi, just for your information, some people mentioned the article length and the too extensive battle list, because this would be just a list of wars and not list of battles Talk:List of wars involving Hungary#Redundant battles so we decided to make the list of wars more simple focusing on wars, and we can make separate split articles where we can add battle/siege details, and the article length is more optimized with subarticles: List of wars involving Hungary

Example:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_France

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_battles_involving_France_in_modern_history (sieges also here)

OrionNimrod (talk) 19:36, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]