User talk:Mushy Yank

  1. Home
  2. Wiki
Archived talk: 1; 2; 3; 4; 5; 6; 7; 8; 9.

Hello Mushy. I was in Winterbeast

[edit]

Ask me anything. 2001:8A0:4FA5:6600:2977:A4AD:2F37:865 (talk) 19:43, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi Mushy Yank. Thank you for your work on Sex & Violence (Sin City). Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

not mentioned in target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 14:16, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi Mushy Yank. Thank you for your work on Lost, Lonely, & Lethal. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

not mentioned in target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 14:16, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What the hell?

[edit]

Hello, Mushy Yank,

If you ever return to this account, could you please explain what happened that led you to abandon this account after 6 productive years and create other accounts? I mean, after all of these years and 24,000+ edits you are now blocked as a sock! You have made so many contributions over the years and helped other editors, I'm at a loss as to what is going on. If you would prefer to email me, you can do that as you do not have email enabled. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 18:34, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah that's an unexpected block to me, but I do generally trust that Materialscientist would get it right... so I'm at a bit of a loss. Sad to see this sort of thing happen, and I think I'm more disappointed when I don't see an appeal or response of any kind regarding the block from the person being blocked. I know denials are standard... and often to not be believed... but like, damn. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:11, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, and thank you for your concern. Don't be sad and disappointed: appeal and response were delayed because I was waiting for replies to my emails (that may not have reached their recipients). Which leads us to [edited][an unblock request containing the following text;

[Edited: I had left the following text in an unblock template but it was reverted [see my talk page]; leaving the text here as it is useful for the moment]: I can see no reason why this account should be blocked for "abusing multiple accounts". Please see my talk page and Materialscientist's one, where he states:

there was no obvious abuse on any of them.

(here) I wrote two mails to PhilKnight (one to which he kindly replied) and one to Liz at their own invitation, regarding this issue."

that was ....reverted [with the present message!!! how nice], see page history and my TP] I am honestly puzzled ....@Hey man im josh:.Eva UX (talk) 07:48, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Dolesbang/Whatever the Plan 9 shows, you have to let the Chinese firefly go

[edit]

User:Dolesbang/Whatever the Plan 9 shows, you have to let the Chinese firefly go, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Dolesbang/Whatever the Plan 9 shows, you have to let the Chinese firefly go and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Dolesbang/Whatever the Plan 9 shows, you have to let the Chinese firefly go during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:17, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]