User talk:Mi$ter716

Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Mighty Taco, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Criticize (talk) 14:43, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

there wasnothing disruptive about the edit. Mi$ter716 (talk) 15:10, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Adam R. Steigert have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Adam R. Steigert was changed by Mi$ter716 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.871814 on 2025-09-10T13:32:42+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:32, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chad Smith. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Chad Smith was changed by Mi$ter716 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.939162 on 2025-09-10T13:38:13+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:38, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think this bot is over doing its job, the edit is a reliable source. Mi$ter716 (talk) 15:11, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Actually it's not. Saying "but not limited too" is superfluous. The tense of the phrasing already suggests the inclusion of others not mentioned. The text you added simply isn't needed. This is happening in other edits of your as well. For example, in this edit you added "very" to qualify the word "first". First is first. Was there some other agricultural society that was also first (somehow) requiring us to differentiate here? The addition of 'very' adds nothing to the article. --Hammersoft (talk) 17:57, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Seawolf35 were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Mi$ter716/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

--Seawolf35 ^T--C 15:24, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mi$ter716! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! --Seawolf35 ^T--C 15:24, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Mi$ter716/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Mi$ter716/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. VViking_TalkEdits 15:31, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wow ok first one I'll get it right I don't even know this guy just tried it with someone I've seen around Mi$ter716 (talk) 17:38, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]