User talk:Meeclis

June 2025

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to A Family Affair (novel)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 15:00, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Meeclis! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Gambit (2004 series) several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Gambit (2004 series), please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Please also review the three-revert rule (3RR) which states: "an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page—whether involving the same or different material—within a 24-hour period.". Sariel Xilo (talk) 19:07, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]