User talk:MarbleTangent

June 2025

[edit]

Information icon Please do not introduce links to draft articles in actual articles, as you did to Rivka Ravitz. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. Taffer😊💬(she/they) 16:34, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize. MarbleTangent (talk) 16:37, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
All good, it's a perfectly reasonable mistake to make! If you have questions about editing, the teahouse is a fantastic help channel for newer editors. I hope you enjoy your time here, and happy editing! Taffer😊💬(she/they) 16:39, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'll check it out. Thanks MarbleTangent (talk) 16:40, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to List of titles and honours of Queen SofĂ­a of Spain. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. It s foolish to misrepresent sources when they are available online. We can simply check them to prove that you have lied about their content. DrKay (talk) 19:53, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yitzhak Ravitz (June 16)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AstrooKai were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
AstrooKai (Talk) 15:42, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, MarbleTangent! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AstrooKai (Talk) 15:42, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 2025

[edit]

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Royal Family Order of Charles III, you may be blocked from editing. DrKay (talk) 03:40, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. DrKay (talk) 17:39, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. DrKay (talk) 05:20, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can I know what I have done wrong. MarbleTangent (talk) 08:01, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
We don't usually add birth details of minors to wikipedia, unless they are notable. See Wikipedia:Minors and persons judged incompetent for a user essay on the subject and Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons#Privacy of personal information and using primary sources for our official policy. DrKay (talk) 08:35, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I fully understated. That makes seance, and I wont do that again. Would it make seance to restore the chart of her children, without her great-grandchildren? MarbleTangent (talk) 09:15, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If they can be cited to a reliable source, they can be added. DrKay (talk) 10:30, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have reverted your edit because wikipedia, or indeed any wiki or user-generated content, isn't a reliable source. See Wikipedia:Reliable sources#Self-published sources for guidance. DrKay (talk) 05:21, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Prince Michael of Liechtenstein. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. TheBritinator (talk) 23:22, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I will look for more info MarbleTangent (talk) 09:57, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Oval Office Study

[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Oval Office Study, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:55, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Prince Michael of Liechtenstein. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because issues outlined previously do not appear to have been adequately addressed and it still needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. TheBritinator (talk) 18:34, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]