User talk:Marbe166

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be auto-archived by if there are more than 5.

Help:Archiving (plain and simple)

If you get tired of scrolling on this talkpage. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 11:14, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2024 Austrian Grand Prix - Norris

So I will answer your question here. Yes, Norris retired but was still classified as he completed more than 90% of the race distance. This means it should be shown as "20†" in the standings table on the Wikipedia page. However @Island92 (if I remember correctly) changed this to "20" some months after the Grand Prix, because the final classification for the race indicates that Norris actually finished the race some laps behind the leader. The classification should show "DNF" as the gap of Norris to the leader, instead of "_ LAPS". BryOn2205U (talk) 17:35, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Norris was classified as 7 LAPS. DNF would have been put had he covered 90% race distance. This has always been the case per FIA final race PDF results. He is classified as 7 LAPS, not as DNF which makes you aware that 90% race distance was covered. Island92 (talk) 17:42, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You mean DNF would have been put had he not covered the 90%. Marbe166 (talk) 17:55, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No, Russell retired from the 2024 Australian Grand Prix hence DNF was put, but was classified as 17th as he covered 90% distance.Island92 (talk) 17:59, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm talking about the wiki pages here. They should both be listed as finished with † since they were both classified. Marbe166 (talk) 18:02, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And that's why there should be † next to the "20".

So generally, my point is that these official classifications, as well as the official Drivers' and Teams' Standings tables (at least the ones for F2 and F3) often have mistakes, and it's a shame, because it's the number one source for the Wikipedia standings tables. Especially the mistake where they list "DNS" drivers as "DNF" happens too often. BryOn2205U (talk) 18:35, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's exactly what I meant. The same applies to Norris, when he retired from the 2024 Austrian Grand Prix on lap 64/71. As he completed at least 90% of the race distance, he was classified in 20th place. However, unlike in Russell's case, the classification shows Norris's gap to the leader is "7 LAPS", which would indicate he still crossed the finish line 7 laps behind the winner, which is not true as he retired in the pit lane. BryOn2205U (talk) 18:26, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In place of 7 LAPS there should be DNF (as he effectively retired), but classified 20th for 90% race distance covered, all this to match Russell case. It's FIA mistake in that document this time out, as well as on F1.com results section. It's the first time I am encountering something similar. Island92 (talk) 19:36, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2024-25 FIS Alpine Ski World Cup

Why did you revert my hard effort edit? Didn't you see overflow (left and right scale) you can slide at the bottom. With overall (yellow jerseys included). Sportomanokin (talk) 07:52, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You totally destroyed the table. The first two columns are WAY too wide. Sliders should not be used when the info can be put in a normal table, as it was. Marbe166 (talk) 08:00, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, if you use wide width. At standard (automatic) width, mostly used, works perfectly fine. Sportomanokin (talk) 08:11, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jeanne Calment in her 40's photo

Nobody knows the precise date of "Jeanne Calment in her 40's" photo (File:JeanneCalmentaged40.jpg). On Wikipedia, we should only write verified information, and especially not claim that this photo was from 1915 which is certainly not (actually this photo is very likely from the 1920's as this photo is from the same photosession as her photo on her 1930 ID card). The 1915 error comes from the fact that the GRG re-published this photo with the erroneous legend "at age 40" [which would mean in 1915 or 1916] instead of the original legend "in her 40's" when it was published in 1998. I will therefore rectify again the legend on her page. Carfois (talk) 13:36, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that's not what your edit summary said. It said ""Calment in her 40's" is a more exact legend than "Calment in 1915"", which is simply not true, since she was in her 40s from 1915 to 1925, i.e. less exact than 1915. --Marbe166 (talk) 13:49, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to confuse "exact" and "precise": "in 1915" is more precise than "in her 40s" but it is certainly false (in other terms not exact), while "in her 40s" is less precise but at least this is true (in other terms, this is exact). Carfois (talk) 13:54, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Or maybe it's also me who don't master enough some nuances of English, and at least I didn't express myself clearly enough, as a non-native English speaker, because in French the usage of "exact" seems slightly different than in English. In French, the most common meaning of "exact" is "Which is conform to the reality, to the truth" (second meaning given by the Académie dictionary, "Qui est conforme à la réalité, à la vérité") whereas in English, the first definition according to the Oxford dictionary seems slightly different: "correct in every detail". Carfois (talk) 15:32, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]