Hello, I'm Hekatlys. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Adult education in the United Kingdom have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. – {{u|hekatlys}} ^WOOF 20:56, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for the message.

Please could you let me know what can be improved so I can not make this mistake further?

Thanks! Magwitch49 (talk) 20:58, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! It appears one of your edits as fine, however this edit to Adult education in the United Kingdom did not appear to be constructive at first glance. Unsure if it was an editing test, and at first glance I mistook it as disruptive. I've restored part of this as it was reverted incorrectly on my part, so I do apologise for that. – {{u|hekatlys}} ^WOOF 18:42, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No problem at all! Thank you for letting me know :) Magwitch49 (talk) 04:39, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Dinosaur emojis have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Dinosaur emojis was changed by Magwitch49 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.883026 on 2025-11-20T22:06:48+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:06, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, thank you for your contributions to my new page, List of Rheiformes by population. I noticed that you put in a new population table, which replaced the one I'd made with the same cited IUCN Assessments. As far as I can tell, these Assessments do not list the populations now listed in the table. Could you please let me know where you found the cited population estimates?

Thanks very much! DuckWrangler97 (talk) 16:57, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thank you for the catch. I was drawing from the broader scientific ranges often cited in secondary conservation literature (like BirdLife International data), but I see your point that the specific IUCN Red List entries for 2022/2024 have more conservative or 'Unknown' fields for the total population.

I’ll go back in and update the table to match the exact 'Mature Individuals' count listed on the IUCN Red List to ensure the citations are 1:1. I'll also add a 'Notes' column to explain that total population estimates (including juveniles) are often higher in wider ecological studies. Thanks for helping keep the page accurate! Magwitch49 (talk) 16:58, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good, thank you! FYI, that page is a child page of a larger "List of birds by population" set. If possible, I'd like to keep the template of the table consistent with the rest of these lists if possible. DuckWrangler97 (talk) 17:00, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, after reviewing the edits, I think they go against what the page is supposed to be, which is just a compilation of IUCN resources in a standard format displaying species populations only. I appreciate the added information, but it is better suited for the general order (i.e., Rheiformes) page. I am going to revert to the original structure to keep the formatting in line with the broader set of population articles.

More than happy to discuss further if you think the changes are adding anything the general order page misses. DuckWrangler97 (talk) 18:45, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Magwitch49!

I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

• Editing
• Referencing
• Images
• Tables
• Policies and guidelines
• Talk pages
• Navigating
• Manual of Style

---

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

---

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help. Has a list of maintenance tasks you can do.

Tips

• Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
• It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
• If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue on the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
• Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
• When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
• If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
• Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Se7enNationArmy2024 (talk) 17:02, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings!

I'm happy to see that you're so excited about improving articles here on Wikipedia. Many of your edits are very ambitious and have been called in to question or reverted. This isn't to discourage you, but to let you know that we have a way of doing things to ensure the information made available to readers is accurate and well sourced. Some articles' subjects may have different definitions of notability and may warrant inclusion in the encyclopedia even though at a glance it might not look like it.

I would encourage you to take some time to familiarize yourself with some of Wikipedia's policies and best practices. The template I added has some of the big ones to help you get started. Se7enNationArmy2024 (talk) 17:12, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I just want to ask how you expanded Serenissima's article so fast? Lucky102 (talk) 17:05, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am also concerned about the speed of edits by this user on List of Rheiformes by population. Several citations added were using broken links to old articles, and I can't verify all the information. DuckWrangler97 (talk) 18:43, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Zuni Microsite when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 18:46, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Zuni Microsite. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and Ths is too sparsely referenced to be even a stub. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 19:05, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This really needs additional and better referencing. Please also apply MOS:BOLD

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zuni Microsite and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 19:06, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Magwitch49! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 19:06, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, great work on Blackwater Sandhills Natural Area Preserve. I noticed you claimed the preserve is a part of the "Zuni Microsite", as well as linking it to the relevant (currently deleted) draft. However, this claim was not referenced, and there seems to be no material online of this "Zuni Microsite". Could I ask where you found this information? Per WP:NOR, original research is not permitted on Wikipedia, and I believe creating this "Zuni Microsite" would fall under original research. Zatoicy (talk) 20:39, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Heya,

Thank you so much for the message, and I really appreciate the message about the good work on the first article.

You are right, I have slipped up on the Zuni Microsite section.

The term 'Zuni Microsite' is used in the Virginia Natural Heritage Program and Old Dominion University (ODU) management documents to describe the cluster of preserves (including Blackwater Ecological Preserve and Antioch Pines) that share the same 'Zuni Pine Barrens' ecosystem. You can find the primary documentation here: Zuni Pine Barrens Preserves Management Plan (ODU).

However, I agree that 'Zuni Microsite' might be too niche of a technical label for a general article title if it's hard to find. I am happy to rename the draft to 'Zuni Pine Barrens' or 'Zuni Pine Barrens Preserves' to match the more common terminology used by the DCR and ODU. Would that resolve the concern? Thanks again for helping me get the sourcing right! Magwitch49 (talk) 01:50, 23 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey again. First off, "Zuni Microsite" is not used in the Zuni Pine Barrens Preserves Management Plan (ODU). Second, I would recommend creating a draft for the Zuni Pine Barrens, referencing the relevant documentation. Lastly, I am curious as to where you got the information for the Zuni Microsite. Could you provide the sources used? Zatoicy (talk) 03:43, 23 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]