User talk:Magician Abby

August 2025

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to It (character) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: It (character) was changed by Magician Abby (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.909585 on 2025-08-19T12:28:11+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:28, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Asking if I'm alright in the head implies that I'm not, which is a personal attack. Gommeh 🎮 18:14, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at It (character), you may be blocked from editing. It is never referred to as definitely a glamour in the novel. The Losers speculate that it could be, but it's not confirmed. Gommeh 📖/🎮 17:41, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

But Gommeh I'm not a saboteur you know that too in the novel it's already mentioned read this is already in It Chapter 13, Section 4 If I made a mistake, thank you for alerting me and correcting my mistake. I really appreciate that tank you. Magician Abby (talk) 18:03, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved content from Stephen King into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content (here or elsewhere), Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. The4lines |||| (talk) 15:40, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Arcrev1. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?

It (character)

Hi there Abby, and thanks for your helpful edits to It (character)! Unfortunately I had to remove the reference to Gan (The Other) as there are no reliable sources that state that It was definitely created by Gan. Please see our policies on original research and synthesis for more. Thanks! Gommeh 🎮 13:19, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

But gommeh the final other is Gan right and in the novel Stephen King He said that IT was created by him. Magician Abby (talk) 13:27, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If that's true, then you need to cite that. (see WP:CITE) What page number was that on? I must have missed it. Looking forward to working with you on improving the article. Gommeh 🎮 13:29, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

IT by Stephen king : chapter 22 Ritual of Chüd p 1060 bill in the null / previously Magician Abby (talk) 14:29, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I've found the section you mentioned (side note- in English it's called "Bill in the Void/Early" but I still found it) and saw this:

This Final Other was, perhaps, the creator of the Turtle, which only watched, and It, which only ate. This Other was a force beyond the universe, a power beyond all other power, the author of all there was.

— King, Stephen (1986). IT (U.S. Amazon Kindle ed.). New York, NY: Viking. p. 1070. ISBN 978-0-670-81302-5.

I know that the Other plays a role in the Dark Tower series, but I haven't read those books myself. If you can find any direct references to Gan being the same Other that created It, please let me know. Gommeh 🎮 14:41, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can you re-edit me? Magician Abby (talk) 14:46, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean? Gommeh 🎮 14:47, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I mean In the novel It, an entity known as the Turtle refers to It as his "brother in chapter 22 Ritual of Chüd bill in viod / early p 1060 or 1070 Magician Abby (talk) 15:09, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you mean this:

—I take no stand in these matters.
My brother—
—has his own place in the macroverse; energy is eternal, as even a child such as yourself must understand
He was flying past the Turtle now, and even at his tremendous skidding speed, the Turtle's plated side seemed to go on and on to his right. He thought dimly of riding in a train and passing one going in the other direction, a train that was so long it seemed eventually to stand still or even move backward.

— King, Stephen (1986). IT (U.S. Amazon Kindle ed.). New York, NY: Viking. p. 1070. ISBN 978-0-670-81302-5.

Then I'm pretty sure that was Bill talking about Georgie, not the Turtle talking about It. Gommeh 🎮 15:22, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Man I mean the turtle said to bill IT is my brother Magician Abby (talk) 17:05, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bill was talking when he said my brother, not the turtle. You can tell by the way they talk. Gommeh 🎮 17:55, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

false you should read all the page from the beginning to end and Do not cut any part of it and go to the previous page to understand what happened. I also have a question. Have you really read the novel before or is this the first time you are reading it or what? Magician Abby (talk) 18:00, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've read the novel several times actually. And I made sure to reread the pages in question. Bill does not talk like this: "has his own place in the macroverse; energy is eternal, as even a child such as yourself must understand", the Turtle does. Bill doesn't really know or care much about the macroverse, so it would make zero sense for him to say that Georgie "has his own place in the macroverse," would it? No. Instead, Bill was trying to ask the Turtle something about Georgie (it's unclear as to what) but was interrupted by the Turtle. Additionally, I'm assuming you aren't reading the original English and are using a translated version; the original English doesn't directly mention the word "brother" anywhere near that section; I know because I looked it up. Therefore, we can't cite that section to back up the claim that Maturin the Turtle and Pennywise the clown are siblings. Doing so would be either original research or synthesis, both of which are discouraged on Wikipedia. If you can find a text that specifically and unambiguously uses the word brother to refer to It, then that would be good enough, however I really doubt the section you pointed to refers to It. With regards to your now-removed comment suggesting that Bill was seeking the Turtle's help in defeating It, that part is true however. If we wanted to make the claim that the Turtle is Its brother, we'd need to find a text that unambiguously says so.Gommeh 🎮 18:08, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Prior to taking the former of Pennywise, IT also existed in the Macroverse as the adversary of Maturin. Both IT and Maturin are billions of years old, and while the turtle regards IT as his "brother", Maturin is looked upon with contempt by IT, who views itself as a superior being to all other life. While IT Chapter Two ending charts its own path, Maturin also proves to be a great ally of The Loser's Club in King's novel, aiding the group in their first encounter with Pennywise as children in one of his rare direct interactions with humans. Magician Abby (talk) 18:23, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Take this Magician Abby (talk) 18:31, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've started a discussion at Talk:It (character)#Relationship with Maturin the Turtle to discuss this with other editors. I have a feeling this could potentially be included, but given guidelines regarding using ScreenRant I think it would be best to get consensus first. Feel free to partake in discussion there. Gommeh 🎮 18:50, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

oh man Mike said to losers club in chapter 10 (the reunion) The IT cycle lasts for two bad years and lasts for about 14 or 20 months and not as you wrote in Wikipedia that the cycle lasts for one year. Magician Abby (talk) 09:32, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also, with all due respect, there is no evidence in the novel that IT first preyed on North American tribes in reality. This is how IT cycles in the novel 1715-1716: It awoke. Magician Abby (talk) 09:47, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing that out, I agree the novel says there is no evidence for that. However, the story is different in the films which are also official, where Mike says that It fed on the people of the fictional Shokopiwah tribe. Might we include that? Gommeh 📖/🎮 10:44, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a specific amount of time. It generally takes a year or two to complete its cycle, but the exact amount of time can vary. Gommeh 📖/🎮 10:36, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, we can't include that. We have to say what Stephen King said, and also those are cinematic additions that we are not allowed to delete and contradict what the original writer said. Magician Abby (talk) 10:48, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

man Can you re-edit me? In Notes "b" and thank you Magician Abby (talk) 17:25, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I mean Notes"c" Magician Abby (talk) 17:28, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025

Hello, I'm Gommeh, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Pennywise, it appears that you added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Specifically, you added "However, this is not Its true form, but the true form of the creature in the physical realm which is the closest representation of Its true form, as Its true form is genderless." This information has had to be removed at least a few times because it is not cited anywhere in the source material "It". Please don't add it again without a citation. Thanks! Gommeh 📖/🎮 13:12, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Man there is a lot of duplicate content here please help Magician Abby (talk) 15:33, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I mean Citation Magician Abby (talk) 15:37, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You can't expect other editors to find content for you on your request, that is not how Wikipedia works. If you're saying that there are citations to the source material that back it up, please tell me where the novel says that. Gommeh 📖/🎮 15:25, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Pennywise. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 21:09, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Gommeh. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that in one of your recent contributions to Pennywise, you cited a link to a source that may not be reliable. Sources considered unreliable should generally not be used to support statements. Information from an unreliable source can be challenged by other editors and removed. Reliable sources are generally those with a reputation for fact-checking and editorial oversight. Self-published material, user-generated content, and certain other outlets such as blogs, wikis, personal websites, and websites or publications with a poor reputation for fact-checking may not meet these standards. If you are unsure about which sources are appropriate, there is a list of sources that are considered generally reliable. Additionally, some WikiProjects have their own lists of sources that are considered reliable for that particular subtopic. If you are still unsure about a source's reliability, you can ask at the reliable sources noticeboard. The reliability of Bustle is unclear, can you find a good reason as to why this should be included? See WP:BUSTLE. Gommeh 📖/🎮 18:12, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Do you want me to add todash space like this / in front of the macroverse because they are implicitly and very much the same place? Magician Abby (talk) 17:11, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean? I am confused. Gommeh 📖/🎮 17:16, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I mean in the dark tower novels there is specs, darkness space Its name is Todash Space. It's like the Macroverse. There's a possibility that they're the same place too. So I said in the origin of the character that wrote The Macroverse, I said to add Todash Space or Todash Darkness, so it becomes like this: origin: the Macroverse / Todash Darkness. Do you understand what I mean? You can also search for the command Todash Space and if it is the Macroverse yourself Magician Abby (talk) 17:28, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm unfamiliar with the Dark Tower series so I can't say. Best to ask this on Talk:Pennywise or Talk:The Dark Tower (series) and get consensus before doing anything. Gommeh 📖/🎮 18:28, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Open the Talk bout this please Magician Abby (talk) 20:01, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You can do that yourself by going onto Talk:Pennywise and clicking on "add topic". See Help:TALK for more. Gommeh 📖/🎮 20:06, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you delete the profession? Magician Abby (talk) 10:50, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you refer to deleting "serial killer" as a profession, I made that deletion and clearly explained it in my edit summary. Please carefully read edit summaries before making inquiries here. Serial killer is not a profession. He's a serial killer, but he is not employed as a serial killer. There is no job of serial killer that someone applies for and is hired to do. The closest would to a profession would be contract killer, but that's also dubious and anyway does not apply to Pennywise. Sundayclose (talk) 15:05, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I mean clown Magician Abby (talk) 15:07, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The same reason - he's not paid to be a clown is he? Gommeh 📖/🎮 14:33, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Very good, I have one question for you, why do you always cancel and delete my edits? Do you have a problem with me Magician Abby (talk) 16:09, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No, we don't have a problem with you. If you take a look at the edit summaries for this edit on September 10th and this one on the 9th, for example, you can see that Sundayclose described the issue why the edit was reverted. Your edits on the 10th were reverted because the See Also section is only for links to other articles that aren't already linked to somewhere else in the article. Your edit on the 9th was reverted because the occupation section of the fictional character infobox is only for things that the character is paid to do in-universe. Pennywise doesn't have a paying job, so that was removed. Finally, I reverted this edit from the 8th because that information is not related to the subsection you put it in (reception by critics), and it is also unnecessary trivia (see WP:TRIVIA) that would perhaps be better suited for It (2017 film) or Bill Skarsgård. Information on the Pennywise article needs to be about Pennywise, and that felt more about the actor who played him than the character. Gommeh 📖/🎮 17:22, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gommeh I have evidence from a novel I wrote. The sentence you deleted, which I wrote, is (It finally found Earth and immediately thought of crashing into Earth since humans had much more complex imaginations then any other species it has ever seen before). I have evidence of it. It is true that it is not exactly as it was stated, or at least as I wrote it, but it is close. Well, in Part Five (The Ritual of Chüd) — Chapter 21: “Under the City It / August 1985, he tells us why he chose Earth and fed on human fears. Magician Abby (talk) 17:19, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you wrote a novel then it needs to be published to even consider it as a source. Give us a link to the publication. I could claim that I wrote a novel stating that It came from Mars, but that doesn't mean I can put it in the article. Additionally, a novel by someone else does not confirm what is in the universe created by Stephen King. Sundayclose (talk) 17:24, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't write anything Stephen King either. I gave you the chapter title and number. Look it up yourself Just look for Part Five (The Ritual of Chüd) — Chapter 21: “Under the City It / August 1958 Magician Abby (talk) 17:43, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What's your point about a novel you wrote?? Sundayclose (talk) 17:47, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

😂😂😂 oh man Again, I haven't written any novel at all. Just look for Part Five (The Ritual of Chüd) — Chapter 21: “Under the City It / 1958 in the novel It and you'll understand everything. Magician Abby (talk) 18:12, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You said, "I have evidence from a novel I wrote". Sundayclose (talk) 18:16, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, there was a typing error due to a problem with my phone. Anyway, I meant to say that I have evidence from the novel It about the reason for feeding on the fear of humans, and this is mentioned in Part Five (The Ritual of Chüd) — Chapter 21: “Under the City It / 1958 in the novel It. So, I apologize for this error, it was not intentional due to the phone. Magician Abby (talk) 18:21, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Magician Abby, let me again urge you to arrange to be mentored by an experienced editor, which you agreed to do in a section below. It can help you learn why your edits are reverted and, more importantly, how to make edits that will not be reverted. Sundayclose (talk) 18:09, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Gommeh. I noticed that you recently removed content from Pennywise without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. I noticed you removed an inline citation to a reliable source here without leaving an explanation in the edit summary. Maybe this was an accident; if so, please be more careful in the future. Gommeh 📖 🎮 17:29, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, there was a typing error due to a problem with my phone. Anyway, I meant to say that I have evidence from the novel It about the reason for feeding on the fear of humans, and this is mentioned in Part Five (The Ritual of Chüd) — Chapter 21: “Under the City It / 1958 in the novel It. So, I apologize for this error, it was not intentional due to the phone. Magician Abby (talk) 18:41, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Gommeh. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Pennywise, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Gommeh 📖 🎮 14:20, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Page moves

It is really bad form to move pages without discussion. Please don't do it again. You're a new editor. Please slow down. You need more experience before making such bold moves. You create messes that others have to clean up. Sundayclose (talk) 20:58, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Magician Abby and edits to Pennywise. Gommeh 📖/🎮 13:59, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A suggestion that I hope you'll take advantage of

Often new editors benefit from being mentored by an experienced editor. See WP:Adopt-a-user/Adoptee's Area. It's a way to learn the ropes of editing and avoiding consequences of problem edits, which unfortunately if left unchecked can lead to a loss of editing privileges. Please try this. Thanks. Sundayclose (talk) 16:03, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I agree. Magician Abby (talk) 20:08, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Very good. The next step is to go to WP:Adopt-a-user/Adoptee's Area and follow the instructions for "How to find an adopter". Sundayclose (talk) 20:13, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You agreed to being helped by a mentor but have failed to make any effort to do so. You continue to make problem edits. If this continues you eventually could lose your editing privileges. Please click the link above and seek a mentor. Sundayclose (talk) 18:17, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	Thanks for your efforts contributing to Pennywise. Your efforts helped me get the article to good article status. I think you'd make an excellent contributor to Wikipedia once you've learned the ropes. Keep up the good work! Gommeh 📖 🎮 04:20, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

did I win I can't believe that thank you all Magician Abby (talk) 16:53, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AI

Hello, I'm Gommeh. An edit that you recently made to Pennywise seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is usually unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you for adding the source though, I've since used it in the article. Using AI to search for sources is acceptable in some cases, as long as you verify 1) that the sources are reliable (which is true in this case per WP:INTERVIEW and WP:PRIMARY) and that the sources make the claims you are citing them for (which is also true). I just wanted to make sure you are aware of our guidelines on the use of AI. Gommeh 📖 🎮 17:04, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bad links

Please take five seconds to actually look at where your links go before publishing them. This link goes to a disambiguation page. Sundayclose (talk) 15:10, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

November 2025

Hello, I'm Gommeh. I noticed that you recently removed content from Pennywise without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Gommeh 📖 🎮 16:47, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On April 1, 2022, Stephen King teased fans that both Randall Flagg and Pennywise are the same entity, though subsequently made it clear he was joking.

ref>"Stephen King weighs in on Pennywise and Randall Flagg debate". SYFY Wire. 2022-03-31. Retrieved 2025-11-12.</ref> do this for me Magician Abby (talk) 16:51, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, the information you added citing Syfy (https://www.syfy.com/syfy-wire/stephen-king-weighs-in-on-pennywise-randall-flagg-debate) both:

Had obvious use of AI (WP:LLM)
Was incorrectly formatted (it lacked a </ref> tag) which caused a display error.
Stephen King himself admitted it was a joke, which means he was not being serious and therefore there are doubts over the information's accuracy.
Even if the information about Pennywise and Randall Flagg being the same person was true, that wouldn't belong in the reception section anyway. The reception section is only for comments and analysis from other sources not directly related to the subject, which Stephen King does not qualify for as he is the creator.

Gommeh 📖 🎮 16:51, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please find a place to put it. Magician Abby (talk) 17:03, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

do this man Magician Abby (talk) 17:13, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I would highly recommend you get a mentor by signing up at the Adoptee's Area, which you said you would do in September but have not actually done. A mentor can help you answer all these questions and contribute constructively. I can tell you are really passionate about this, but you need someone who is able and willing to guide you.

In response to what you said, most people on Wikipedia won't make edits on others' behalf. That means, a better route to take would be either:

Asking on the article's talk page where in the article that information should best be placed. Someone who's familiar with the guidelines can give you their opinion on the edit. Or,
Analyzing the content of the article and determining where best to place the edit yourself. Ask yourself, "before I place this new sentence in there, what is the paragraph already talking about? Does it still flow well after I put the new stuff in?"

You should get some experience using talk pages for discussion about edits like this. A lot of your edits have been challenged or reverted in some way, so I'd recommend using the article's talk page to discuss an edit you're thinking of doing. Gommeh 📖 🎮 17:37, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

do you love good for me right thanks about that always Magician Abby (talk) 18:31, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid I don't understand what you're saying. Gommeh 📖 🎮 18:38, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I support the idea that you should get a mentor. You have been asked to do so repeatedly, and you said you would do so. It would avoid a lot of problems and help you make constructive edits instead of problem edits. Why have you not done so? Sundayclose (talk) 19:27, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Additionally, it still appears you're using AI. This is generally frowned upon; please read WP:NOAI (yes it's a humorous essay but still makes good points). Gommeh 📖 🎮 19:35, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as at Talk:Pennywise, please be sure to sign your posts (but never when editing articles). There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Gommeh 📖 🎮 16:07, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

First and foremost, thank you for your continued trust. I have a suggestion: what do you think about adding the courses I mentioned in the discussion, along with the sources I cited? It would be truly helpful to Pennywise Wikipedia and would greatly improve this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Magician Abby (talk • contribs)

Original research

Hi Abby. I noticed that you've been having a LOT of your edits reverted. A lot of removed edits are because of something that is called "original research." Do you understand what that means? Joyous! Noise! 03:46, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

no Magician Abby (talk) 09:53, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If I am adding to an article, Wikipedia doesn't want my original thoughts. I need to find OTHER people who have written about my topic and had it published somewhere, and put THEIR thoughts into my words. And I will use a reference to tell people reading the Wikipedia article where the information came from.

A lot of what you've been trying to add is your own thoughts and interpretations of what Stephen King meant. That's original research. Joyous! Noise! 14:22, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]