User talk:Lucasattitude
Welcome!
[edit]Hi Lucasattitude! I noticed your contributions to Sanjay Dutt and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! MakaylaHippo1998 (talk) 03:31, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
December 2025
[edit]
Please do not remove content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Dhurandhar, Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Thank you. RangersRus (talk) 15:53, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Dhurandhar, you may be blocked from editing. Odanr(she/it)(talk) 06:17, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Unconstructive edits/ reference: Aditya Dhar
[edit]Hi, Please learn the Wikipedia writting policy and style. Plus, your placement of references and unnecessary syntax is disruptive and unconstructive. Your edits within policies will be expected.
Your passion is respected; however stop making Fluffy fandom based exaggerated edits. Learn to read previous editor remark. Introduction and encyclopedia should be Concise, and NOT Bulky. Repeated edits will be deemed as Vandalism. SakuraSmart (talk) 15:55, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
- Hi, You are constantly told to avoid disruptive edits.
- Too many trivial information, Disruptive edits, Pronoun not followed, reference placement incorrect. FPOV
- You dont mention all his works which is already mentioned under Filmography. Unless it has major impact.
- I request you to follow WP:MOS SakuraSmart (talk) 09:23, 19 December 2025 (UTC)
- Please follow WP:NPOV policy. Introduction paragraph is concise version, don't duplicate information already featuring in main body. You are doing unconstructive/disruptive edits SakuraSmart (talk) 09:10, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
Unreliable/ Unsourced/ App source links/ Disambiguation
[edit]Hi, Encyclopedia should on the person of interest, his details with reliable sources; It is not promotion of film cast/ director's, bulky film introduction or other details. Unsourced paragraphs is unreliable/WP:FPOV. Eg: Blogs, Self media, YT, FB, Twitter, Insta is not reliable Back your sentences with reliable sources, else it is considered WP:FPOV and place it as per policy. Refer WP:RS/P No application based citations. Undid revision SakuraSmart (talk) 07:58, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
Edit Warring
[edit]
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing a page's content back to how you believe it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree with your changes. Please stop editing the page and use the talk page to work toward creating a version of the page that represents consensus among the editors involved. Wikipedia provides a page explaining how this is accomplished. If discussions reach an impasse, you can request help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution such as a third opinion. In some cases, you may wish to request page protection while a discussion to resolve the dispute is ongoing.
If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, or whether it involves the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also, please keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule— if things indicate that you intend to continue reverting content on the page. RangersRus (talk) 10:09, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Dhurandhar Budget by NDTV
[edit]Read carefully this line in the NDTV source and please do not revert again. Taran Adarsh shares that Dhurandhar was made on a budget of Rs 300 crore, including both parts. [1]. RangersRus (talk) 15:58, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
[edit]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. RangersRus (talk) 01:55, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
[edit]
You have recently edited a page related to the region of South Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.