User talk:Kiranpawar3210

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Dympies (talk) 04:16, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Daniel Case (talk) 23:29, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Daniel Case (talk) 23:32, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj portrayed.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj portrayed.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under the non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj portrayed.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj portrayed.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:06, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #99974

was declined and I told the user to make their unblock request here. Note that the user falsely claimed to be unaware of WP:3RR. This is demonstrably false, see here. --Yamla (talk) 18:38, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Someone tagged me in rules but, I didn't know much about this rule, but now I'm learning & starting to understand Wikipedia's rules. Kiranpawar3210 (talk) 18:57, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You falsely claimed you were unaware of the rule. You were told about the rule, you responded to that, and you acknowledged the rule (by removing the comment). You are free to make an unblock request, WP:GAB explains how. But I'm afraid claiming you were unaware of the rule just won't work. While we are at it, take the time to ensure you thoroughly understand contentious topics, which you've been informed about above. --Yamla (talk) 19:00, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm new here, I made some mistakes, but I'll follow the rules carefully from now on. Kiranpawar3210 (talk) 19:09, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Battle of Umberkhind

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Battle of Umberkhind. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Draft:Battle of Umberkhind. Because of the duplication, your article has been speedily deleted. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Draft:Battle of Umberkhind. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at [[Talk:Draft:Battle of Umberkhind|the article's talk page]].

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think the article you created should have remained separate, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. UtherSRG (talk) 18:50, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ahmadnagar Sultanate. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Do not break internal link syntax. Also you didn't add accompanying sources. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 19:19, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Then why was it published as Marathi kingdom earlier? See here Kiranpawar3210 (talk) 19:31, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It was unsourced, added by an IP in Jan 21, 2025, which went unnoticed by other users including me. I've removed it and restored the longstanding sourced version. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 19:34, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Raigad Fort, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Raigarh. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]