User talk:Karabawan

July 2025

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at DuterTen, you may be blocked from editing. Thewideawake1 (talk) 12:28, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Adding information with citations from verifiable sources is not considered a violation. Karabawan (talk) 12:29, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Karabawan! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of DuterTen several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:DuterTen, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 12:40, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at DuterTen shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Scoria (talk) 12:55, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Thewideawake1 has already violated this rule. Please open a discussion on the page's talk page and engage in constructive dialogue instead of repeatedly reverting the page. Karabawan (talk) 12:59, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No, @Karabawan did. Thewideawake1 (talk) 13:00, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you did. You repeated the same actions with different reasons. Karabawan (talk) 13:02, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You did it Thewideawake1 (talk) 13:03, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to DuterTen, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Scoria (talk) 14:58, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

COI

Hello, Karabawan. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the Edit Request Wizard), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Borgenland (talk) 14:35, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 2025

You have been blocked from editing for persistent edit-warring on multiple pages.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Black Kite (talk) 15:37, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]