User talk:Kane43

Welcome!

Hello, Kane43, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome!  Kwesi Yema (talk) 19:55, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Kane43 Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. Kwesi Yema (talk) 19:53, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Kwesi Yema shambles419 ur not smart kid🤣 Kane43 (talk) 19:58, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Kwesi Yema send a reliable source proving theres 12M nandes in DRC I've noticed you've gone out your way to change it from 2,400,000 to 12,400,000 where are your sources? Kane43 (talk) 00:36, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An IP address was responsible for such vandal changes on 1 June 2025. This has been reverted. You can update the population of these pages only if a reliable source is provided. If you have an issue with an article, raise it on its Talk page. Kwesi Yema (talk) 00:52, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Joshua Project is not a reliable source

Per Wikipedia:JOSHUAPROJECT, Joshua Project is considered an unreliable source on Wikipedia. Read Wikipedia:Reliable Sources and Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources to understand what kind of sources are to be used or avoided on Wikipedia. Kwesi Yema (talk) 23:27, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Kwesi Yema There are no sources to prove that the Kumu population is 400k, but as you can see, there’s a source more reliable than Wikipedia showing it’s 963,000. You’re not even Congolese, yet you’re all over everything related to Congo. You even stalk all our ethnic groups—like bro, are you really okay? Don’t you have any shame? Why not focus on West Africa instead? Kane43 (talk) 00:34, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. Kwesi Yema (talk) 09:45, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lendu People Congo (September 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikishovel was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

As noted at your user talk page, Joshua Project is not considered a reliable source on Wikipedia. References 8, 9, 10, 13 and 14 are all dead links, and the book references don't have page numbers.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lendu People Congo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Wikishovel (talk) 17:44, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kane43! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Wikishovel (talk) 17:44, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025

Welcome to Wikipedia. Editors are expected to treat each other with respect and civility. On this encyclopedia project, editors assume good faith while interacting with other editors. Here is Wikipedia's welcome page, and it is hoped that you will assume the good faith of other editors and continue to help us improve Wikipedia! Thank you very much! taavi (talk!) 09:32, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Kwesi Yema (talk) 00:07, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

November 2025

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing articles for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. You are free to make well-referenced neutral Edit requests on article talk pages. If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Cullen328 (talk) 03:40, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]