User talk:Jonkeren1

This is Jonkeren1's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ulrike Nagel (August 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lijil was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Well done on creating the draft, and it may potentially meet the relevant requirements (including WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO, WP:NJOURNALIST) but presently it is not clear that it does.

The rules for what can be included in the English Wikipedia are different to many other language wikipedias, so it's possible she is notable per the a Dutch Wikipedia but not the English one. For the English one she would need to have significant coverage of her as a person in reliable independent sources, mot just confirmation that she is a journalist. You can read WP:NJOURNALIST to see if there are any specific criteria that would fit her.

If you think she fulfils these criteria for notabiloty, it would help our volunteer reviewers if you could identify, on the draft's talk page, the WP:THREE best sources that establish notability of the subject. It would also be helpful if you could please identify with specificity, exactly which criteria you believe the page meets (eg "I think the page now meets WP:NJOURNALIST criteria #3, because XXXXX").

Please see the articles ‘Your First Article’, ‘Referencing for Beginners’ and ‘Easier Referencing for Beginners’.

Please familiarise yourself with these pages before amending the draft. If you feel you can meet these requirements, then please make the necessary amendments before resubmitting the page. It would help our volunteer reviewers by identifying, on the draft's talk page, the WP:THREE best sources that establish notability of the subject.

Also, if you have any connection to the subject, including being the subject (see WP:AUTOBIO) or being paid, you have a conflict of interest that you must declare on your Talk page (to see instructions on how to do this please click the link).

Once you have implemented these suggestions, you may also wish to leave a note for me on my talk page and I would be happy to reassess.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ulrike Nagel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lijil (talk) 21:35, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jonkeren1! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Lijil (talk) 21:35, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I only just now saw your message. Thanks for replying. The issue with this person is that there are several contributions by this person, not so many of this person. She is notable for being born in a european country that does not exist anymore (GDR), and being an expert on germany on several dutch and german radio / tv news outlets. Example https://www.youtube.com/@Ulrike-Nagel There are some interviews with / about her to be found like https://ulrikenagel.nl/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/2024-VPRO-Ulrike-Nagel.pdf but I do not know if those are enough to make her "notable". Jonkeren1 (talk) 09:21, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]