User talk:Joe Cerniglia

Welcome!

Hi Joe Cerniglia! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! – LuniZunie ツ_(talk) 21:36, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the warm welcome! Joe Cerniglia (talk) 23:00, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2025 UC11 (November 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Guninvalid was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
Essay-like writing
Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
Close paraphrasing

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This object is very clearly notable and I'm almost surprised that this article hasn't been written yet. But this draft is not acceptable for AfC, as there is strong evidence it was written using a large language model, and the citations are completely improperly formatted.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2025 UC11 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

guninvalid (talk) 19:51, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Joe Cerniglia! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! guninvalid (talk) 19:51, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:2025 UC11 has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:2025 UC11. Thanks! guninvalid (talk) 00:05, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gun,

Thanks for the update. I was thinking about studying some additional articles to add some depth to the AfC, and have already begun doing that. On account of your encouragement, I will resubmit the AfC and continue to edit it, as I have been doing since I first posted it. I submitted a curl command in my terminal to the wikimedia api and it appears to give the article a "GA" rating now. We'll just have to see whether that holds up in ORES. (I know these are not perfect predictions, but they give a sense of the general level of quality of an article.)

Anyway, I'll resubmit. Your feedback is making the article better by holding me to the appropriate standard. These are the same standards to which I hold myself. I have gained a lot more facility with the Wikipedia editing environment than I had just a few days ago.

Best Regards,

Joe Joe Cerniglia (talk) 00:59, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]