User talk:Jodi.Krol

Welcome!

Hi Jodi.Krol! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 21:46, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Stereopsis—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 13:04, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain.

I extended the content of page Stereopsis to contain all aspects of binocular visison. Stereopsis is only part of it. Then I moved the content to page Binocular vision, because this title is at a higher level. Then I made a redirect to the chapter Binocular_Vision#Stereopsis.

This seems completely logic to me.

Jodi.Krol (talk) 13:16, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am using the dutch wiki sandbox because it is not possible to make subpages on the Englisk wiki. Then moving to the real page, there exist errors resulting from differences between the Dutch and English wiki, which I have to correct on the real page. It would be convenient if I could simply make a subpages on the English wiki too.

Jodi.Krol (talk) 13:25, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Stereopsis

Hey, stop doing such edit as you did on Stereopsis (1299939576). And remove these edit as they are causing error to citation template.––kemel49^{(connect)(contri)} 09:11, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

it has been removed. It was the result of translating dutch wiki, which should not have translated citations.

Jodi.Krol (talk) 07:31, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, While translating do remember to change citation templates compatible with english wikipedia. If you can't find one, look at wikidata to find the english version of template. Happy Editing.––kemel49^{(connect)(contri)} 07:50, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wim van de Grind moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Wim van de Grind. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is not how academic pages are written in this WP. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ldm1954 (talk) 02:19, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Wim van de Grind has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Wim van de Grind. Thanks! Ldm1954 (talk) 02:22, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]