User talk:Jijijef

This is Jijijef's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ali Tajdari (June 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CSMention269 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ali Tajdari and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️^{(😐 ● 🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔)} 04:33, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jijijef! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️^(😐 ● 🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔) 04:33, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article is not mine. Someone brought it back to Drafts after four years. The article had previously been approved by experienced administrators.

The question is: Why has an article been moved to Drafts after four years, simply because of a personal conflict on Instagram? In an Instagram post, someone threatened to delete the article about Ali Tajdary, and later mockingly claimed, “See? I deleted it.”

Please report this to the senior administrators. If necessary, I can provide the link to that Instagram post or send a screenshot of the page via email to the higher-level admins.

The issue is that even I noticed the article was moved back to Drafts after that person publicly threatened in a post to delete Ali Tajdary’s Wikipedia page due to personal bias.

Here is the link to the Instagram post where the threat was made:

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DKxYNw8ojho/?igsh=MWUxbDNmY3hzaGV6MQ==

This is a very serious matter — it’s not just about the creation or deletion of an article. It involves threats and personal conflicts from another platform (Instagram) that are now affecting Wikipedia.

I’ve even addressed some of the minor issues in the article myself, but personal threats against an individual should not be allowed to result in the removal of their biography.

Please take this situation seriously and ensure that Wikipedia remains neutral and protected from external pressure. Jijijef (talk) 12:55, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What? Do you even know what are you saying? The subject was deleted by administrator due to a copyright violation two years from now. Administrators have the right to delete. No other users have the privilege to do so. Not even amonymous. You may not create this but submitted the draft. So this message has been sent to you as submitter. ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️^{(😐 ● 🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔)} 13:20, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I do know what I’m saying.

(In my opinion, your tone was not polite, and I think you should reconsider the way you address others.)

Administrators can review the article’s history and clearly see that I was not the original creator.

Also, how could it suddenly be considered a copyright violation exactly at the same time when individuals on another platform began making public threats to have the article removed? The timing is suspicious.

Besides, all the issues have already been resolved. I’ve updated the references, removed broken links, and added reliable sources. The article is now in good shape.

Now it’s up to the administrators to review the situation and make the best possible decision. Jijijef (talk) 13:25, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ali Tajdari (June 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bunnypranav was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ali Tajdari and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 14:34, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ali Tajdari (July 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The comment left by Destinyokhiria was:

no changes since resubmission

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ali Tajdari and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Destinyokhiria 💬 13:20, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ali Tajdari (July 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cassiopeia was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ali Tajdari and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cassiopeia talk 23:11, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

COI inquiry

Hello, Jijijef. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Ali Tajdari, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the Edit Request Wizard), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:42, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unnecessary and unwelcome formatting to AfD discussions, as you did here and again here. It is disruptive and does not help make your case for keeping the article (if anything, it's going to suggest to other editors that you do not know what you are doing and that your arguments should be ignored with extreme prejudice). Additionally, please address the above COI inquiry before making further edits. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 00:05, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

LLM warning

Hello, I'm Left guide. A comment that you recently made at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ali Tajdari seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Editors should not use LLMs to write comments generatively. Communication is at the root of Wikipedia's decision-making process and it is presumed that editors contributing to the English-language Wikipedia possess the ability to come up with their own ideas. Your comment may have been struck or collapsed. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Left guide (talk) 14:21, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for the note. I didn’t use any AI tools — just tried to organize the references clearly and use decent grammar, since it’s an AfD discussion and I thought clarity would help. If it came across as too polished, that wasn’t the intention.

Happy to clarify anything or adjust the comment if needed.

Since our English isn’t as advanced as yours, we sometimes rely on Google or translators to express ourselves clearly in discussions like this. Jijijef (talk) 14:34, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]