User talk:JayElk33

  1. Home
  2. Wiki

JayElk33, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi JayElk33! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse
We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 21 February 2021 (UTC)


February 2021

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Murder of Alison Parrott has been reverted.
Your edit here to Murder of Alison Parrott was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VKC9ZkGoAqE) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 20:30, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kimberly Cheatle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Comer. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 10:03, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. Thanks for pointing that out. JayElk33 (talk) 14:33, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eurasia Group, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BMO.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

[edit]

see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diana Fox Carney if you're interested. Moxy🍁 22:32, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Carbon tax, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daniel Smith.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited CPP Investments, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomberg.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:01, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited CPP Investments, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blackstone.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ontario Pension Board, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomberg.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello JayElk33! Your additions to OMERS have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:06, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Great. I did not know that. Thanks. JayElk33 (talk) 16:03, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If you get the chance, please see my revised edit on OMERS. Thanks. JayElk33 (talk) 16:28, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

[edit]

Read up on WP:NPOV again, please. It is laughable (to put it mildly) to insinuate that Rebel is anything other than far-right. ―"Ghost of Dan Gurney" (hihi) 16:35, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What is far-right? Hitler? The far-right politics page on Wikipedia does not describe any independent news media or Party I know of in Canada. Some people do not think the 'spectrum' is even relevant as Parties are syncretic. JayElk33 (talk) 17:39, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I read the NPOV. You seem to be in violation of it. I was striving for neutrality. Far-right, far-left...these seem like outdated terms, and subjective. JayElk33 (talk) 17:42, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I was going off of what reliable sources say. If this is your opinion, then I really don't think you're here to build an encyclopedia. ―"Ghost of Dan Gurney" (hihi) 18:37, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please explain further about "far-right politics." And "reliable sources." Do you believe it when someone implies that your fellow Canadians are like Hitler? The fact that I'm open to talk and get all information out there, and am not attacking you...You want to build an encyclopedia that includes some information but not all? JayElk33 (talk) 18:45, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The David Cochrane interview was a 'reliable source'. Why would you delete it? It was recorded. JayElk33 (talk) 18:47, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
On reverting edits: "Before performing a revert, carefully consider the consequences of dismissing another editor's contributions, as well as any subsequent edits linked to the original change. Assess the specific elements of the edit that are problematic and contemplate the editor's intentions. Rather than reverting entirely, consider improving the edit to enhance the article's quality. If only a portion of the edit is objectionable, a partial reversion may be more appropriate; complete reversions should be used sparingly and are effectively executed using the undo tool." After Ivanector dismissed my good faith edit, I incorporated his efforts into a new edit. JayElk33 (talk) 17:48, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Megxit edit

[edit]

Hello, just messaging you here directly to provide further clarity on why I reverted your edit. In summation, the content you added is redundant/unncessary to the article, as it already exists in in two separate sections in much greater detail.

As seen in the The agreement > Further developments > 2020 section

On 27 February 2020, Bill Blair, the Canadian Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness issued a statement saying "As the Duke and Duchess are currently recognized as Internationally Protected Persons, Canada has an obligation to provide security assistance on an as-needed basis. At the request of the Metropolitan Police, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) has been providing assistance to the Met since the arrival of the Duke and Duchess to Canada." The statement went on to say that Canada would cease providing security for the couple on 31 March, "in keeping with their change in status." In the same announcement, it was confirmed the RCMP had provided security for the couple on an as-needed basis, since their arrival to Canada in November 2019. During their five-month stay on Vancouver Island, Harry and Meghan were protected by the Metropolitan Police and the RCMP, at a cost to Canadian taxpayers of over $90,000(CAD) in overtime and expenses: RCMP officers' salaries were not included. In February 2020 and after their exit from the monarchy was negotiated, the term Internationally Protected People was removed from their website.

And again the Reaction > In Canada section.

An online petition from the Canadian Taxpayers Federation garnered more than 90,000 signatures by 23 January 2020, demanding that the couple pay out of their own pocket for their security, which according to the Canadian Taxpayers Federation was, at least, C$93,000 in overtime and expenses for the November 2019 to January 2020 portion of their stay that ended in mid-March 2020. Aaron Wudrick, Federal Director of the CTF, said, "We're proud to have given voice to the vast majority of Canadians who felt subsidizing the Sussexes’ lifestyle choices was an outrageous use of tax dollars." As of February 2021, the total for security costs, as well as reimbursements made by the Sussexes, if any, have not been disclosed by the RCMP. Leventio (talk) 15:11, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I found the correct information in the previous section. But, the Reaction/Canada section implies that Justin Trudeau and the government were upfront about taxpayer-funded protection, from the onset, which they weren't. JayElk33 (talk) 20:30, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited International students in Canada, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marc Miller.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:59, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]