User talk:JJMC89
| This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:JJMC89. |
 | Bot-related queries:
|  |
|
2015: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2017: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2019: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2020: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2021: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2022: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2023: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2024: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2025: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be auto-archived by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 2. |
Two categories merged to a third
[edit]Hi, a newbie at CFD listed some merges including some lines with the pattern
- Source_1 and Source_2 to Target
This is not a valid format; they should have been listed on separate lines. The bot did process them, but not as intended; it processed them as if they had been coded
- Source_1 to Source_2 and Target
See e.g. [1]. I think it would be better if the bot did not process lines coded in this way, but skipped them, like it does for lines that are in conflict with other lines. – Fayenatic London 15:09, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
- Creatively not following directions ... I'll take a look. — JJMC89 18:46, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Speedy deletion rejections
[edit]Hi JJMC89, can you please look at my talk page and also wiki project football about why I nominated all these articles for speedy deletion? I believe there is a strong consensus for these blank page re directs to all be deleted. Thanks. Rupert1904 (talk) 18:06, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
- That does not mean that they qualify for speedy deletion. The place to form consensus for deletion of redirects is WP:RFD, not your or a WikiProject's talk page. — JJMC89 18:42, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
- They do qualify for speedy deletion. There is a general consensus that the user who created all these blank club season articles and re-directed them to the club's main article page did so to get the credit for creating the page. They have not contributed any substantive edits to the 40 plus article since creating the re-directs and do not respond to any sort of communication. This behavior and editing should have been dealt with long before rather than ever even getting to this stage. Rupert1904 (talk) 23:31, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
- That still does not constitute a reason for speedy deletion. We have fixed rules for when pages can be speedy deleted, which you can't simply bend to your whim like that. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:34, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
- They do qualify for speedy deletion. There is a general consensus that the user who created all these blank club season articles and re-directed them to the club's main article page did so to get the credit for creating the page. They have not contributed any substantive edits to the 40 plus article since creating the re-directs and do not respond to any sort of communication. This behavior and editing should have been dealt with long before rather than ever even getting to this stage. Rupert1904 (talk) 23:31, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Non-free image using
[edit]I would like to apologise for using Emblem of West Bengal (2018-present).svg without knowing it's actually a non-free logo. I thought it was usable because it was used in the Government of West Bengal article. It won't happen again. Vijay6767 (talk) 22:46, 6 September 2025 (UTC)