User talk:Infinityeditor

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arun Ajikumar (July 21)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Far too much unreferenced content.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:45, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Infinityeditor! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:45, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have updated the draft with more valid inline citations. Infinityeditor (talk) 08:23, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arun Ajikumar (July 21)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Does do meet WP:NACTOR who did not have lead or significant roles in multiple films.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
RangersRus (talk) 14:48, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I Have updated the draft after carefully reviewing the notability guidelines. It now includes verified film credits that reflect Arun Ajikumar’s contributions in both supporting and prominent roles, along with citations from reliable sources. He began his acting journey in 2011 and made his feature film debut in School Bus (2016). In addition to acting, he is also an established publicity designer in the Malayalam film industry.
Arun currently has several notable projects in the pipeline,Thank you for taking the time to review the revised article. Infinityeditor (talk) 17:30, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Arun Ajikumar has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Arun Ajikumar. Thanks! RangersRus (talk) 21:35, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arun Ajikumar (July 22)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Thilsebatti was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Thilsebatti (talk) 04:24, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arun Ajikumar (July 24)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by PunjabiEditor69 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- PunjabiEditor69 (talk) 15:44, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]