User talk:Imnew0ten2

This is Imnew0ten2's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: St. Boniface Catholic Church (Lafayette, IN) (July 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:St. Boniface Catholic Church (Lafayette, IN) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RangersRus (talk) 02:06, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On your recent article submission

Hey, I'm HC226. While I'm not an extremely expereienced editor (around 400 edits and 1 page created right now), I would love to help you with the article you're writing. However, I cannot find independent sources covering it extensively. If you are able to provide them, do let me know so that I can help you to write and format your article properly. All the best. HC226 (talk) 16:38, 9 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks HC226, other than the church website and the neighborhood's website (both were listed in the draft), there are not really any other sources with tons of information other than address, contacts, or photos.. The nearby Cathedral already has a Wikipedia page so the draft is modeled after that. The Cathedral got approved with only 4 sources (The National Register of Historic Places, It's Historic District, Emporis listing an article on it, and the cathedral's about us page. And St. Boniface already has a historic plaque and is also in a historic district with their own website. So to me it should be able to get approved. The draft is short because I didn't want to spend forever adding the history and everything. Hope you can help! Imnew0ten2 (talk) 01:12, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but for any topic to be considered notable enough for inclusion, evidence of significant coverage from multiple reliable and independent sources must be provided. If something lacks the required breadth and depth of coverage from the types of sources we need, then it just isn't notable enough.

Not every building in the world has its own article, nor every small sub-unit of a larger organization. You can try rewriting the draft all you want, but no amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 05:33, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]