User talk:Ibrahimnok

[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello Ibrahimnok! Your additions to Northern Progressive Front have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license—to request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. The4lines |||| (talk) 01:03, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mallam Ibrahim Nock (September 21)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ktkvtsh was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Not enough inline citations for the amount of information presented. “ He worked underground building confidence among many former unionists and this helped a lot in uniting the country.” According to who? “ At Alhudahuda he met many young northern boys who bore their names along with their town's names and this made him to also start bearing Ibrahim Nock as his name.” Lots of run on sentences as well.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Ktkvtsh (talk) 04:12, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Ibrahimnok! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ktkvtsh (talk) 04:12, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mallam Ibrahim Nock (September 21)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by GoldRomean were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The examples Ktkvtsh mentioned are not the only ones; there are a lot of uncited statements throughout the article. Does the source really say Nock’s career bridged technical training, union activism, and public administration... Mallam Ibrahim Nok is remembered as one of the foremost northern Nigerian trade union leaders, who helped shape the structure of labour federations during a critical period of Nigeria’s early independence.?
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
GoldRomean (talk) 06:13, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mallam Ibrahim Nock (September 21)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
RangersRus (talk) 13:40, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I believe its because of the many mere mentions cited that makes you conclude that he is not worthy of an article. I used most of the google books citations to verify the years talked about and most of the citation have in-depth detail of the topic if you access the complete document on google books. This is a subject that the history of the Nigerian Trade Union movement can't be complete without the mention of his role. Wikipidia is the best and most reliable place to collect and preserve such histories. I am going to rewrite it and streamline the article focusing basically on the positions he held and the role he played in the development of Labour Union in Northern Nigeria Specifically. I wish wiki make provisions for uploading hardcopy content for validation. would have uploaded more independent sources to backup most of the tinks I cited. the fact that they exist and make their mark before the digital era should not disqualify them from wiki article Ibrahimnok (talk) 11:10, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]