User talk:HulkNorris

March 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contribution(s). I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, while user talk pages permit a small degree of generalisation, other talk pages such as Talk:Finland–NATO relations are strictly for discussing improvements to their associated main pages, and many of them have special instructions on the top. They are not a general discussion forum about the article's topic or any other topic. If you have questions or ideas and are not sure where to post them, consider asking at the Teahouse. Thanks. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 20:16, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from deleting what I said I getting tired of this.. HulkNorris (talk) 20:24, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:Finland–NATO relations for general discussion of this or other topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See the talk page guidelines for more information. Thank you. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 21:33, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I concur with what Blaze Wolf is saying. Edits such as this are not aimed at improving the article, which is what we use article talk pages for, but rather discussing the subject directly. This is wholly unnecessary and, as Blaze Wolf notes, violates WP:NOTFORUM. Please do not restore this material again, as you did here.

Additionally, here you indicate you were blocked, but your current account has not been blocked before. Was there another account where you were blocked? What account?

Lastly, please be aware of WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA. Referring to someone as a "troll" as you did here is out of line. Continuing to act in this manner can lead to a block of your editing privileges. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 01:18, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:Finland–NATO relations, you may be blocked from editing. The article talk page of the Finland-NATO article is not the place to express your views about Viktor Orban or the approval process for admitting Finland to NATO. Write a letter to your local newspaper or to the Hungarian embassy in your country, or post a video to social media, but do not use article talk pages to express your views. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 00:57, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're probably close to a WP:NOTHERE block, you haven't made a single edit to an article. 331dot (talk) 01:00, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's not true, I've made many edits to articles as a IP. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HulkNorris (talk • contribs)

Okay, but what I said is still accurate. 331dot (talk) 18:40, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. DDMS123 (talk) 06:57, 15 May 2023 (UTC) Please dont tell things to mme like I'm new! HulkNorris (talk) 07:02, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Short description

Dates are generally encouraged in short descriptions for biographical articles, as per WP:SDDATES. If you strongly feel that Pola Uddin, Baroness Uddin wouldn't benefit from including "(born 1959)" in the shortdesc, that's fine, but I must say that I did not appreciate the personal attack in your most recent edit summary, which was entirely inappropriate and unnecessary. — RAVENPVFF · talk · 22:59, 20 May 2024 (UTC) If you show more respect for me I do the same for you. HulkNorris (talk) 14:34, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 18:57, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand why I have been blocked. The bitte irony is how much I like Star Trek and the Admin responsible for it is named Sarek of Vulcan. Please explain to me what is wrong here.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HulkNorris (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The block was not rightful so I appeal against it HulkNorris (talk) 19:22, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you:
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:25, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

A very large proportion of your edits are "please update the German wikipedia because I can't edit there". There are also quite a few badgering other editors to respond to you. And the posts "Did this person attend this wedding? Why not?" And, of course, there's the exchange above with Ravenpuff. It all adds up.

If you want to be unblocked, you can follow the directions above, but you should be prepared to tell the reviewing editor how your editing going forward will avoid the pitfalls you've been hitting before. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:29, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Noting user is also blocked on German language Wikipedia. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:36, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As I have stated earlier in 2015 I think it was after many problems with people attacking me a person attack me personally and I reported him but not he was blocked. I was blocked tzhe admin attacked me too. As another user told me this aadmin was secretly working against me for a long time. But I have noted her strange behavior for myself. I have written many articles worked so much for Wp and it is tiring to have so many people gainst myself. Now this is happening here. Yes I'm stating veryclearly my opnion and vvery much against hate because I've have suffered so much myself and eople I like all this hate speech in social media and WP is not acceptable. But nothing noted about my work here was against Wikipedia.— Preceding unsigned comment added by HulkNorris (talk • contribs) 20:03, June 4, 2025

In a list of family members a divorded person belong there too. Because of it he is there. So I can describe excluding someone from that place hate. So was I blocked for that opinion?— Preceding unsigned comment added by HulkNorris (talk • contribs) 20:06, June 4, 2025

User:SarekOfVulcan: Sadly there never was an answer that derseves the name. Some things were written abut me. But nothing from it violated anything. I'm here to do good things. Helping to make wikipedia better after living through harrasment here. So I appeal and please let us start a dialogue., What happened here? Why was I really blocked? Why can't people show a little respect like I try with others? Please be kind and not dispose of me like some dirt. HulkNorris (talk) 19:05, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello User:SarekOfVulcan, after you did not respond the last time I should clearly state one more time what's important to me. I was blocked with the explanation "clearly not here to build an enc." But that's wrong. I'm here to learn, to work alone and with others. I've never done a bad thing for wikipedia. So please unblock me there is no reason to have something against me. HulkNorris (talk) 19:19, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:SarekOfVulcan I beg you to talk with me.

My block

User:SarekOfVulcan: You have not responded but please understand that your decision was wrong. Please let us talk. HulkNorris (talk) 13:00, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:BigBullfrog

Of course the prime minister of South Korea is the head of government. HulkNorris (talk) 15:47, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:SarekOfVulcan

Please respond! I'm clearly here to build an encyclopedia. So please unblock me I've done nothing wrong. HulkNorris (talk) 05:33, 19 July 2025 (UTC) At anyone reading this I must strongly protest the actions of SarekofVulcan. I am clearly here to build something.[reply]

Benutzer:Brodkey65

Can you please work on Liste der Mitglieder des House of Lords as you said? The list is critically out of date with deceased and retired lords still listed as active members and many new ones still missing? HulkNorris (talk) 05:49, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:~2025-21175-

Please block this rightwing troll forever. HulkNorris (talk) 16:16, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User.SarekOfVulcan

You are violating my rights here. You have no rights to block me without a real reason and not responding to my enquiries. Please change your behaviour and review my case. "CLearly not here to biuld an ecyclopidia" is wrong. I'm here to be part of the work here. To learn and help. Please let me return to do that. And please respect me. HulkNorris (talk) 16:12, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Benutzer:Känguru1890

Dier Löschfreak ist verantwortlich für Zerstörung., HulkNorris (talk) 09:14, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your talk page

While blocked you maintain access to this page to make an appeal (see WP:GAB). If you continue to use it to try to get editors to edit on your behalf, your access will be revoked.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:29, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Then I must nmake a request because Srek ignored it. I was blocke but I'm cearly here to build. Despite my work here I was disrespected. There is no reason to block me. HulkNorris (talk) 20:40, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Admins don't review their own blocks. Again, please follow the directions at WP:GAB.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:48, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]