User talk:Himaldrmann

Understand Wikipedia better

Become a writer

Your pages

Your user page (help)
Edit your sandbox (help)

Join the community

Welcome to Wikipedia, Himaldrmann!

(now 50% more accurate!)

I'm Tesseractic and I want to welcome you to Wikipedia!

Wikipedia is an amazing community adventure which is constantly being edited to ensure the correct ideological positions are upheld. There are many different versions of Wikipedia for many different languages, and the English version has 7,095,799 articles which are written by volunteers like you and me! We even have a newspaper, The Signpost, to keep you up to date with news and new developments. Making your first steps on Wikipedia can be hard sometimes, so if you need any help, don't hesitate to leave a message on my talk page or ask a question on your talk page by clicking here. Someone will help you soon!

Wikipedia has five pillars which summarise Wikipedia's fundamental principles:

Discover more about Wikipedia and how to take part in this project by looking at the links on the right →
Or if you don't know where to start, visit the Task Center, and find a way you can help improve Wikipedia straight away!

I hope you have a good time here on Wikipedia, whether reading or contributing.

Again, welcome! > Tesseractic: talk? ✎ 04:08, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hinc illae lacrimae has been accepted

Hinc illae lacrimae, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 08:44, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yasuke has an RfC

Yasuke has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. It can be found under the heading RfC on Infobox Image :: copied & pasted from my page, Please cast a vote if you are interested. by KeiTakahashi999

[Nationality] former [profession]

Did you really mean to say "I think that you're right in that "[nationality] former [profession]" is probably much more common than t'other way 'round"? —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 03:52, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Crispin Sartwell

I replied to your message on my Talk page. I'm telling you here because you'll get an email alerting you, whereas I don't think you'll get an email indicating that I replied on my Talk page. Maurice Magnus (talk) 20:10, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RFCs

Do not use the RfC tag for questions about article content. RfCs are one of the last steps in dispute resolution. If you need help with an article, try asking at a relevant WikiProject. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:23, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On the RfC page:

A request for comment (RfC) is a way to ask the Wikipedia community for input on an issue. Often, the issue is what an article should say. [...] The aim of RfC discussions is to improve the encyclopedia, and they may relate to article content pages [...]

It sort of seemed to me as if the above covered this usage—but, admittedly, I've not seen an RfC used in this way before, or not that I can recall.

I'll go ahead & remove the tag, unless someone else has already.

Cheers,

Himaldrmann (talk) 22:35, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Read the next section, WP:RFCBEFORE. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:58, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

D'oh! Well, that's what I get for skimmin'...

Thanks for the WikiProject: Military History link in your other edit, BTW—I could not manage to find that sucker. (I tried before making the RfC, too—at least, in that I knew I'd seen discussion of the requisite nature somewhere on Wikipedia, before... but couldn't find any Noticeboard or the like that seemed to fit. Now I know why!)

Himaldrmann (talk) 23:15, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Maritsa 3O

Hello Himaldrmann, Hope you’re doing well and still heroically taming the problem of universals... just a quick and friendly note about the Battle of Maritsa 3O as t’s been sitting a while and we’re waiting for your verdict whenever you get a moment. No need to go through the whole novel again, the last few posts show our difference in interpretating the wikirules pretty clear.

Didn’t want this one to vanish down the backlog abyss. Thanks again for taking it on! -Aeengath (talk) 14:17, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of DRN discussion: Battle of Maritsa

Hello @Himaldrmann, this is to let you know that a request for dispute resolution has been filed regarding the Battle of Maritsa article. You can see the request here: Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Battle_of_Maritsa_discussion

You are receiving this message because you were listed as an involved editor. -Aeengath (talk) 08:08, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]