User talk:Freesucrose

  1. Home
  2. Wiki

Information icon Hello, I'm Tedickey. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. TEDickey (talk) 19:48, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Byfron Technologies moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Byfron Technologies. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris talk! 05:02, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Florida State University shooting

[edit]

Hello,

I've reverted your addition of the article at Florida State University shooting to the original redirect. The article previously existed, but was deleted following Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Florida State University shooting (2nd nomination). If you want to draft the article if you believe the subject is notable, go through WP:AfC. However, this specific does not appear to meet the notability guidelines. Thanks! ~ Eejit43 (talk) 18:07, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Summaries

[edit]

Hey there! Thanks for getting involved with Wikipedia!!

I noticed that you very rarely provide edit summaries when you make changes to articles. I don't know if it is a limitation of the setup you are using to edit or not, but it can be really helpful for other contributors when you use edit summaries. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

Please try to provide an edit summary for every edit you make. You can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Tick Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button.

Thank you again! –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 19:14, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Tarlby (t) (c) 17:35, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Aeroméxico Cargo moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Aeroméxico Cargo. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 19:43, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days, and you are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

You are extended confirmed, so that is not an issue, but please be aware of the other restrictions surrounding edits related to Israel. 331dot (talk) 16:24, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved content from Iran–Israel war into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content (here or elsewhere), Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. I have now added Copied template to the Timeline of the Iran–Israel war talk page in order to provide the necessary attribution. CNC (talk) 12:49, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]