User talk:Fready Sedy

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lyn Fish (November 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GGOTCC was:

We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lyn Fish and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GGOTCC 19:37, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I just accepted the submission. I didn't know Wikispecies redirects were a thing, but I just looked at Category:Redirects_to_Wikispecies and there are actually several hundred, so I guess this is a valid submission. —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 19:40, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fready Sedy! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GGOTCC 19:37, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lyn Fish

Hello, Fready Sedy,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Cloventt, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged Lyn Fish for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. You may find our guide for writing quality articles to be extremely informative. Also, you may want to consider working on future articles in draft space first, where they cannot be deleted for lacking content.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Cloventt}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

David Palmer//cloventt ^(talk) 20:57, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

it's a redirect to Wikispecies. See {{Wikispecies redirect}} Freddy^{[citation needed]} 20:59, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Fready Sedy! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages.

Getting Started

Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article
The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset
How to: edit a page • upload an image

Getting Help

Policies and Guidelines

Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research
Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines
What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons

Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule
Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy
External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry
Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community

Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program
Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette
No personal attacks • Resolving disputes
Build consensus • Village pump
Discord server • IRC channels • Mailing lists
The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)

Things to do

Task Center • Be bold in editing
Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles
Join a WikiProject • Translating articles
Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism

Miscellaneous

Happy editing! --pro-anti-air ––>(talk)<–– 23:34, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Pro-anti-air: thanks, but please put this at the bottom of talk pages next time, if there were messages there sent before this one. Freddy^{[citation needed]} 08:33, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of User:Rumba_Samba_Mambo/template/User_faggot

Hi, thanks for reporting your concern of the user page being an attack page, however looking at the page log it's evident that the user placed the template on their own page, which they are allowed to do. In this context, "Faggot" is not meant to be disparaging or an attack, but a badge of honor, if that makes sense. Please also seen the withdrawn XfD [[1]] for the same rationale All the best, N.J.A. | talk 12:26, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't F*ggot a slur? Freddy^{[citation needed]} 12:29, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, when used to disparage someone. This is a user badge that the user placed themselves, and per the closed XfD I linked to above, this is an example of reclaiming, and allowable. N.J.A. | talk 12:31, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

November 2025

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to U R MR GAY—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 14:52, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at User talk:Materialscientist, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Sugar Tax (talk) 14:58, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for discussion of Template:TAIV block

Template:TAIV block has been nominated for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Sugar Tax (talk) 15:04, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Fready Sedy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

@Zzuuzz: Please unblock me. I am NOT 14 novembre. I'm just a new user who wants to contribute constructively. If you checkuser first 14 novembre, then me, you will see that we are in the same country, but different region.

Decline reason:

I don't believe you. Yamla (talk) 15:36, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have reviewed my findings, and end up agreeing with myself. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 15:16, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. JeffSpaceman (talk) 17:21, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

November 2025

Your talk page access has been revoked for personal attacks and harassment. Please read WP:UTRS for your unblock options. Cullen328 (talk) 17:52, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]