User talk:Footy Archivist

Welcome!

Hi Footy Archivist! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 22:22, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

Hi Footy Archivist! I noticed that you recently made an edit at Fitzroy Football Club and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia: it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 22:22, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, North Melbourne Football Club, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please see WP:BURDEN concerning whos responsibility it is to source information. Thank you. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 21:42, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, one more thing @Footy Archivist, please stop marking non-minor edits as minor. See the above message about message about minor edits and Help:Minor edits to see when using that checkbox is appropriate. Thank you. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 21:43, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of John Kidd Guest

Hello Footy Archivist,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged John Kidd Guest for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 11:11, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. It was made in error.Thanks. Footy Archivist (talk) 11:14, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]