User talk:FiveGeekabytes

20th Congress of the Philippines moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to 20th Congress of the Philippines. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. harrz ^talk 19:23, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Second ladies and gentlemen of the Philippines for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Second ladies and gentlemen of the Philippines is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Second ladies and gentlemen of the Philippines until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Hariboneagle927 (talk) 04:38, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Senate of the Philippines did not have an edit summary. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should be explained by a clear edit summary, or by discussion on the Talk page. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. When logged in to your Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! – macaddct1984 ^{(talk | contribs)} 12:37, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Janan2025. I noticed that you recently removed content from Senate of the Philippines without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Janan2025 (talk) 12:45, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good day! I would like to extend my apologies for this matter. The edit made was about the addition of a link to a comprehensive list of the current Philippine senators serving in the 19th Congress. I deemed it fit for the list to be expanded into a page of its own so I added a redirect to the said page. The redirect meant that it would be better to remove the tables containing the current members and reorganize the content. I would appreciate your guidance on the matter on what to do moving forward.

Thank you! FiveGeekabytes (talk) 13:36, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]