User talk:EmilySarah99

  1. Home
  2. Wiki

Your edits to Napoleon

[edit]

Hello there

I reverted your edits because the consensus is not to add this information to the info box. (Please refer to the previous discussions about this on the article talk page.) You are an experienced editor so you should know that you should not mark an edit as "minor" when you are adding content, especially content that is contrary to the existing consensus and is likely to be controversial: see Help:Minor edit. Also, please do not add misleading edit summaries: you added parents and the "house of Bonaparte", not parents and spouses. Did you really think no one would notice? Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 10:06, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,
Thankyou for reverting the edit, if i had been aware of the consensus on the talk page iI would have done so myself. I wouldn't have considered such a change as controversial, considering how often those fields are used in similar articles. You are right, in an article so large as Napoleon, any omission should be considered intentional and require further research. As for the edit summary, I write those quickly and and I have written a lot of them. It was not my intention to be misleading, I believe instead of selecting save, I selected an autofill prompt instead.
I appreciate you bringing this to my attention and will be more careful in the future.
EmilySarah99 (talk) 06:41, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red September 2025

[edit]
Women in Red | September 2025, Vol 11, Issue 9, Nos. 326, 327, 347, 348, 349
Recognized as the most successful topic-based WikiProject by human changes.


Online events:

Announcements:

Tip of the Month:

  • Researching historical women writers who used pseudonyms requires careful investigation across multiple sources, as many women adopted pen names to avoid gender bias and judgment (e.g., being labeled a bluestocking) and, ultimately, to get published.

Progress ("moving the needle"):

Other ways to participate:

--Rosiestep (talk) 23:52, 31 August 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red | October 2025, Vol 11, Issue 10

[edit]
Women in Red | October 2025, Vol 11, Issue 10, Nos. 326, 327, 350, 351, 352
Recognized as the most active topic-based WikiProject by human changes.


Online events:

Announcements:

Tip of the Month:

  • Notable does not always mean admirable; you don't have to like an article's subject to make the article a useful contribution to Wikipedia.

Progress ("moving the needle"): Statistics available via various tools: previously, Humaniki tool; currently, QLever.
Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 6,283 articles during this period:

  • 19 May 2025: 20.114% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,066,280; 415,618 women)
  • 24 September 2025: 20.20% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,088,533 biographies; 421,901 women)

Other ways to participate:

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:29, 29 September 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Draft:Template:Russian royal weddings

[edit]

Hello, EmilySarah99,

Just a note that this draft page was deleted as a CSD G13, a stale draft. You might consider having this template restored and moved out of Draft space so that other editors could learn about it and make use of it. Good luck! Liz Read! Talk! 01:39, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red - November 2025

[edit]
Women in Red | November 2025, Vol 11, Issue 11, Nos. 326, 327, 353, 354

Recognized as the most active topic-based WikiProject by human changes.

Online events:

Announcements:

Tip of the Month:

  • Verifiability is increasingly important as AI evolves. You should ensure that every statement made
    is adequately sourced. There should be no less than three independent reliable sources for each
    biography, including at least one source for each paragraph.

Progress ("moving the needle"):

  • Statistics available via various tools: previously, Humaniki tool; currently, QLever. Thank you if
    you contributed one or more of the 20,473 articles created in the past year.
  • 21 Oct 2024, 19.963% of biographies on EN-WP were about women (2,030,245 biographies; 405,305 women)
  • 28 Oct 2025: 20.23% of biographies on EN-WP were about women (2,094,677 biographies; 423,778 women)

Other ways to participate:

--Rosiestep (talk) 17:05, 30 October 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Princesses of Georgia

[edit]

Information icon Hello, EmilySarah99. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Princesses of Georgia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:06, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Caroline Matilda of Saxe-Cobourg and Gotha

[edit]

Information icon Hello, EmilySarah99. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Caroline Matilda of Saxe-Cobourg and Gotha, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:07, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]