User talk:Cyrobyte

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be auto-archived by if there are more than 4.

New pages patrol September 2025 Backlog drive

September 2025 Backlog Drive \| New pages patrol
On 1 September 2025, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:31, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Cyrobyte. Thank you for your work on Naga 3. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 00:15, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Caterina Scorsone edit

I have reverted your addition of a date of birth to Caterina Scorsone because it was cited to IMDb. I appreciate your effort to improve the article, but that source is not reliable for use in Wikipedia articles. Please see WP:IMDB for comments about that status. You might also want to read WP:USERGENERATED to see some other sources that are similarly unreliable. Eddie Blick (talk) 19:27, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speaking of sources, you're once again adding "de facto" to Ukraine articles, none of the sources you're citing use the term anywhere, equating "occupation" with "de facto" (you even went as far as adding "de facto" Donetsk People's Republic, giving undue weight to what is essentially a puppet state) is WP:SYNTH, and this is the second time you've done it. TylerBurden (talk) 16:43, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to discussions about infoboxes, and edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

—Fortuna, imperatrix 16:02, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]