User talk:Cornerstone1949

This is Cornerstone1949's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome!

Hello, Cornerstone1949, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! 🌳 Balsam Cottonwood (talk) ✝ 04:47, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Naji Mohamed Issa Belqasem (May 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HickoryOughtShirt?4 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Naji Mohamed Issa Belqasem and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 19:16, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cornerstone1949! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 19:16, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Naji Mohamed Issa Belqasem (May 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToadetteEdit was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Naji Mohamed Issa Belqasem and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ToadetteEdit (7M articles) 20:17, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... I have read the image use policy, but am having trouble determining if an image found on the internet is copyrighted or not, and if it can be used. Is there an easy way to do this? Cornerstone1949 (talk) 04:59, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You should have read that almost all images "found" on the internet will not be usable because they do not have associated with them a release that would allow use on Wikipedia. We presume images are protected by a restrictive copyright in the absence of some such positive release information. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:32, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Naji Mohamed Issa Belqasem has been accepted

Naji Mohamed Issa Belqasem, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ca ^{talk to me!} 15:55, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Other Times has been accepted

Other Times, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MCE89 (talk) 11:51, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Florian Gadsby (October 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Carolina2k22 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Florian Gadsby and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Carolina2k22 • (talk) 01:54, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Camilla

Her affair was at least as much of a big deal from a notoriety perspective as Andrew and his association with Epstein. It involved Diana, possibly the most famous woman of the last 50 years (certainly one of them), and Charles of course, and it's the reason she's now the Queen. It was massive, but it's not as relevant today as it would have been say 25 years ago as far as opening her encyclopedia article. Utahredrock (talk) 02:26, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I just looked at her article and her affair is the third sentence in her lead. It's also the 2nd sentence of the 2nd paragraph. So the same place I am now proposing Epstein go into Andrew's lead (aka the third sentence overall). Utahredrock (talk) 02:37, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That makes sense. Her current lead lining up with the new proposal for Andrew would potentially be a good thing to point out on the talk page too. I think those of us who didn't live through it underestimate how famous Diana was. That said, Camilla is pretty notable now for being the Queen of England, and if Andrew somehow gets a similar role later in life, we can always change the lead, as unlikely as that all is to happen. All in all, I don't think such a prominent mention of Epstein is inappropriate in the slightest. Cornerstone1949 (talk) 02:47, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]