User talk:CollectXpertAd

September 2025

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because it has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, website, or role, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must follow all these steps:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
Provide a new username.

To do this, insert the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can search to see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is still available.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:27, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CollectXpertAd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand my editing came across as advertising. I have disclosed my paid :relationship on my user page per WP:PAID and will follow WP:COI going :forward. I will not directly edit articles or drafts about CollectXpert or any :closely related topics. Instead, I will suggest changes on article/draft talk :pages using {{edit COI}} and submit any new content through Articles for :Creation for independent review. I’m willing to accept a topic restriction :prohibiting direct edits on those topics. Thank you. CollectXpertAd (talk) 08:48, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As per below. Yamla (talk) 12:12, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You haven't said what new username you want. What independent reliable sources with significant coverage do you have about your company that you could summarize in an article? These should not be press releases, staff interviews, brief mentions, annoucements of routine business activities, or other primary sources. They should provide coverage that demonstrates that the company meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable company.

Wikipedia is not a place for companies to just tell about themselves, their offerings, and activities; companies don't merit a article merely because they exist. 331dot (talk) 14:08, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]