User talk:Chronos.Zx

This is Chronos.Zx's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 6 days

FYI

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RAHMANI AYURVEDA - Cabayi (talk) 13:23, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Damn, Thanks for the heads-up, Cabayi. Chronos.Zx (talk) 13:39, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clerodendrum albiflos has been accepted

Clerodendrum albiflos, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 13:43, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks KylieTastic. Chronos.Zx (talk) 13:48, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Seal of Gorkhaland

Hi, you added accessdates to the sources of this article[1] (which I have now draftified), but they all give 404 errors. Were you actually able to access these sources? If not, then please don't add accessdates and don't mark an article as reviewed. Fram (talk) 09:32, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There were many issues in the article, so I’ve tried to fix some of them. I couldn’t access a few of the sources...so I thought it might be a browser issue on my end. I’ve also notified the article creator about issue. Btw, Thanks for pointing them out, I'll keep this in mind for the future. Chronos.Zx (talk) 10:32, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]