User talk:Cheesepizzaaa

September 2025

[edit]

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to 12th Man (film) did not have an edit summary. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should be explained by a clear edit summary, or by discussion on the talk page. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit and/or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

or in the visual editor:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Describe what you changed

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. When logged in to your Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Tick Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Janan2025 (talk) 06:41, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to the region of South Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days in order to make edits related to two subtopics: (1) Indian military history, or (2) social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Chronos.Zx (talk) 01:24, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

October 2025

[edit]

Hi Cheesepizzaaa, please do not add incorrect information to articles as you did on Kantara: Chapter 1. When making edits, ensure that you provide reliable citations. For guidance on editing articles related to Indian cinema, please refer to WP:FILM/INDIA. Thanks. Tonyy Starkk (talk) 05:28, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Indian military and caste topics require ECP

[edit]

As noted in the message above,[1] you need to first become WP:ECP (500 edits) editor before editing about Indian military and caste. THEZDRX (User) | (Contact) 12:28, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

November 2025

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Aadirulez8. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Renji Panicker, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Aadirulez8 (talk) 19:08, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]