Hello, I'm Adamstom.97. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Captain Marvel (film) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. adamstom97 (talk) 07:27, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Dhurandhar have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Dhurandhar was changed by Canilup (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.894345 on 2025-12-15T13:43:28+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:43, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dhurandhar 1 and 2 are shot together, not separately so you don't know how much money was needed for Part 1 and Part 2 separately. In such a case, budget of both together is written with a bracket for (shared with Part 2). Refer Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 1 for example. JokerDurden (talk) 17:05, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Then rewrite the entire article about Part 1 and part 2 combined. Canilup (talk) 08:20, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ALSO, since no one knows hence the use of "est". Canilup (talk) 08:27, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dhurandhar. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Dhurandhar was changed by Canilup (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.884953 on 2025-12-16T18:44:42+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:44, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content and add unsourced changes from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Dhurandhar, Your content removal and unsourced changes does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Thank you. RangersRus (talk) 10:46, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing a page's content back to how you believe it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree with your changes. Please stop editing the page and use the talk page to work toward creating a version of the page that represents consensus among the editors involved. Wikipedia provides a page explaining how this is accomplished. If discussions reach an impasse, you can request help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution such as a third opinion. In some cases, you may wish to request page protection while a discussion to resolve the dispute is ongoing.

If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, or whether it involves the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also, please keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule— if things indicate that you intend to continue reverting content on the page. RangersRus (talk) 10:53, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

go on dumbass, block me. My credit score isn't gonna go down for not being able to edit a information to factually what is correct on a website where anyone can add anything. Canilup (talk) 13:33, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:No personal attacks Sid95Q (talk) 14:20, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. RangersRus (talk) 16:09, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  EvergreenFir (talk) 17:11, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]