User talk:CalmBeacon

November 2024

Hello, I'm CipherRephic. I noticed that you recently removed content from ABLV Bank without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. It looks like you might have accidentally reverted your own edit in trying to add an edit summary - no worries, everyone makes mistakes :) CR (talk) 17:34, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page ABLV Bank, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless that text is available under a suitable free license. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Diannaa (talk) 14:36, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. JBW (talk) 19:27, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

August 2025

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 16:12, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Request to unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CalmBeacon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello,

I am new to Wikipedia and recently created my first article, which unfortunately led to my account being indefinitely blocked for advertising. I would like to sincerely apologize if my text appeared promotional. This was not my intention and I was hoping to begin contributing in the field of financial markets.

As a newcomer, I now realize that I may not have followed Wikipedia’s content and style guidelines properly. If my writing contained wording that looked like advertising, this was due to lack of experience, not deliberate promotion. I am eager to learn how to write in a neutral, encyclopedic style, and to improve the article accordingly.

I kindly ask you to reconsider the block. I would be very grateful for the opportunity to correct my mistakes, to rewrite the text with neutral wording, and to continue contributing responsibly. I assure you that I will study the relevant policies before making further edits.

Thank you for your time and for considering my request.

Sincerely, CalmBeacon CalmBeacon (talk) 15:04, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This isn't your request, it's an AI's request(100% certain according to zeroGPT). You are blocked, not an AI, so we want to hear from you directly. An AI cannot tell us what is inside your mind. Please write in your own words without the aid of an AI. 331dot (talk) 19:35, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@331dot:

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

CalmBeacon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You know, I wanted to make it a more formal request that would correspond to the spirit of the appeals. I often use it to correct vocabulary and correct errors. That's why I turned to ChatGPT. But if you really need to just give an answer, then no problem.

I prepared this article for a long time as my first full-fledged article on Wikipedia and my goal was to create the first publication that would show me as a future Wikipedian. For the starting area, I chose the economic sector since there are already many people who edit movies and people. And the economic sphere is closer in spirit to me.

Before starting to create this article, I read the rules and prepared the material according to the sources available on the Internet. Then, later, I had less time to allocate it for writing the material and in the end, moving knocked me off track. But nevertheless, I finished it and submitted it to the public space. I don't intend to advertise anyone, but only to create a quality article and instead of directing me, they hit me on the head. Maybe I somehow laid out the information incorrectly, so if you help, I will be happy to listen to how to rewrite my work and improve it and I will use this information in the future to write future publications. CalmBeacon (talk) 15:43, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=You know, I wanted to make it a more formal request that would correspond to the spirit of the appeals. I often use it to correct vocabulary and correct errors. That's why I turned to ChatGPT. But if you really need to just give an answer, then no problem.

I prepared this article for a long time as my first full-fledged article on Wikipedia and my goal was to create the first publication that would show me as a future Wikipedian. For the starting area, I chose the economic sector since there are already many people who edit movies and people. And the economic sphere is closer in spirit to me.

Before starting to create this article, I read the rules and prepared the material according to the sources available on the Internet. Then, later, I had less time to allocate it for writing the material and in the end, moving knocked me off track. But nevertheless, I finished it and submitted it to the public space. I don't intend to advertise anyone, but only to create a quality article and instead of directing me, they hit me on the head. Maybe I somehow laid out the information incorrectly, so if you help, I will be happy to listen to how to rewrite my work and improve it and I will use this information in the future to write future publications. [[User:CalmBeacon|CalmBeacon]] ([[User talk:CalmBeacon#top|talk]]) 15:43, 15 September 2025 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=You know, I wanted to make it a more formal request that would correspond to the spirit of the appeals. I often use it to correct vocabulary and correct errors. That's why I turned to ChatGPT. But if you really need to just give an answer, then no problem.

I prepared this article for a long time as my first full-fledged article on Wikipedia and my goal was to create the first publication that would show me as a future Wikipedian. For the starting area, I chose the economic sector since there are already many people who edit movies and people. And the economic sphere is closer in spirit to me.

Before starting to create this article, I read the rules and prepared the material according to the sources available on the Internet. Then, later, I had less time to allocate it for writing the material and in the end, moving knocked me off track. But nevertheless, I finished it and submitted it to the public space. I don't intend to advertise anyone, but only to create a quality article and instead of directing me, they hit me on the head. Maybe I somehow laid out the information incorrectly, so if you help, I will be happy to listen to how to rewrite my work and improve it and I will use this information in the future to write future publications. [[User:CalmBeacon|CalmBeacon]] ([[User talk:CalmBeacon#top|talk]]) 15:43, 15 September 2025 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=You know, I wanted to make it a more formal request that would correspond to the spirit of the appeals. I often use it to correct vocabulary and correct errors. That's why I turned to ChatGPT. But if you really need to just give an answer, then no problem.

I prepared this article for a long time as my first full-fledged article on Wikipedia and my goal was to create the first publication that would show me as a future Wikipedian. For the starting area, I chose the economic sector since there are already many people who edit movies and people. And the economic sphere is closer in spirit to me.

Before starting to create this article, I read the rules and prepared the material according to the sources available on the Internet. Then, later, I had less time to allocate it for writing the material and in the end, moving knocked me off track. But nevertheless, I finished it and submitted it to the public space. I don't intend to advertise anyone, but only to create a quality article and instead of directing me, they hit me on the head. Maybe I somehow laid out the information incorrectly, so if you help, I will be happy to listen to how to rewrite my work and improve it and I will use this information in the future to write future publications. [[User:CalmBeacon|CalmBeacon]] ([[User talk:CalmBeacon#top|talk]]) 15:43, 15 September 2025 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

I have formatted your comment as an unblock request; I'm not certain when I can review this, so by doing this others Will see and review it if they choose. 331dot (talk) 17:11, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Can you tell us what your connection is to TAMGA or why you chose this company for your first Wikipedia article? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 21:21, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]