User talk:Bespin74
Welcome
[edit]
|
I am Emanuel Champagne, the owner of the "Bienvenue a Patofville" Blog.
Non-free rationale for File:Patof.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Patof.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 12:47, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
- You write on the image page that the photograph is a work of the US government- is this true? J Milburn (talk) 13:24, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
- "Non-free" images, like this one, are usable only if they meet the deliberately strict non-free content criteria. It looks as if this one may do- if it does, I can add a rationale to the page for you and remove the deletion notice. Does this character appear in public at all? J Milburn (talk) 13:52, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
- Should be fine, then. I'll add a rationale to the image page. What was the name of the album from which the image was taken? Do you know who the copyright holder is? J Milburn (talk) 14:45, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
- I have added a rationale to the image page, so it is now usable in Patof. Please check the rationale and correct any mistakes I have made. Thanks. J Milburn (talk) 15:08, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
- Something like 300 by 300 px should probably be enough. It's not a pressing problem, don't worry about it too much. J Milburn (talk) 15:19, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
- I have added a rationale to the image page, so it is now usable in Patof. Please check the rationale and correct any mistakes I have made. Thanks. J Milburn (talk) 15:08, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
- Should be fine, then. I'll add a rationale to the image page. What was the name of the album from which the image was taken? Do you know who the copyright holder is? J Milburn (talk) 14:45, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
- "Non-free" images, like this one, are usable only if they meet the deliberately strict non-free content criteria. It looks as if this one may do- if it does, I can add a rationale to the page for you and remove the deletion notice. Does this character appear in public at all? J Milburn (talk) 13:52, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 1
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Williams discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Gerhardt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
you're welcome
[edit]Thanks for noticing my edits in the John Williams discography - and yes you are correct about the many John Williams's - I'm very careful about attributing anything here without a throrough check as one Wikislip could leade to a lifetime of misinformation - but I do find his participation in the 50's West Coast jazz scene both interesting and notable. DISEman (talk) 00:58, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 15
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Williams discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malibu. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi Bespin - I've deleted the John Williams credit for the Jimmy Witherspoon entry on your advice - I had assumed that it was an early recording from NYC just after his Julliard stint but if others cast doubt then I'm happy to leave it as a credit to one of the less notable John Williams's DISEman (talk) 00:10, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive edits of the John Williams discography.
[edit]My dear Bespin74, You do not "own" the John Williams Discography! Please be aware that repeated uses of the undo function or making the same edit over and over is considered "edit warring" and could result in your being banned. JaneOlds (talk) 11:43, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- @JaneOlds: I think we should report him for clear violations of WP:OWNER. He has been reverting edits that were clearly biased and non-neutral, threatening to "report" me for it. ~ Dissident93 (talk) 23:57, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
- Reformulated to talk about his Oscars and Awards, and his certifications for Star Wars albums. It's more objective. Next time be less rude, try to suggest path of ameliorations instead of just removing some parts of an article. Thanks. --Bespin74 (talk) 10:57, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Bespin74. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Bespin74. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Bespin74. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Bespin74. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Patof
[edit]Hi @Bespin74, you have reverted my revert on the Patof page, so now we are engaged in an edit war. You have been on Wikipedia for nearly as long as I have, and yet you didn't think it was necessary to include an explanation for reverting another editor's work? This is not only rude, but simply not the way things are done on this platform. When one of your edits is reverted, you need to take the issue up on the talk page, not revert back. I encourage you to be civil about this matter, refrain from edit warring further, and discuss any disagreements you may have on the appropriate talk page. Thank you. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 13:34, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- It's not an edit war, as I'll let you win. 2607:FA49:B33E:EE00:545E:2E52:BD88:2ED4 (talk) 14:00, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Do not place comments on another user's userpage
[edit]I have blanked your edits made to User:Edoardo. Tortora. Any comments about a user's edits should be placed on their user's talk page, not their user page. Go to User talk:Edoardo. Tortora instead. TornadoLGS (talk) 18:28, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Patof
[edit]
Hello @Bespin74, I'm Revirvlkodlaku. I noticed that you added content to Patof, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 13:14, 10 September 2025 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Patof. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Besides edit warring, it is not appropriate to revert wholesale the work of other editors. Lastly, language such as "WHAT IS YOUR PROBLEM?" is strongly discouraged on Wikipedia, as it is neither collegial nor collaborative. You are hereby encouraged to discuss any disagreements you may have with other editors on the appropriate talk page, as long as you do so in a civil and professional manner. Any further senseless reverts or aggressive language will be reported to administrators. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 03:40, 12 September 2025 (UTC)