Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Emily Karpel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, BertinGittle!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 21:52, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I am the person behind emily, i am trying to update my hebrew written page into an english one, a shout out for help with this ! ? ! :) BertinGittle (talk) 23:31, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CoconutOctopus was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Emily Karpel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Dear reviewer, this version includes updated references and significant coverage from reliable, independent media including Haaretz, Walla, Mako, and nrg. Sources cover biographical interviews, musical reviews, and performances over time. References now use consistent formatting, and the article includes recognition section. Thank you! BertinGittle (talk) 22:41, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Dear reviewer, this version includes updated references and significant coverage from reliable, independent media including Haaretz, Walla, Mako, and nrg. Sources cover biographical interviews, musical reviews, and performances over time. References now use consistent formatting, and the article includes recognition section. Thank you! BertinGittle (talk) 23:16, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
dead link sources; sources that don't cover the claims maid; and sources that don't have enough info to even attempt to verify
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Emily Karpel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Emily Karpel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hi @KylieTastic, and thank you for reviewing Draft:Emily Karpel.
I've reviewed your feedback and wanted to respectfully follow up. Since your initial comments, I've significantly revised the article, adding multiple reliable, secondary, independent sources — including in-depth features from Haaretz, Walla!, Mako, and nrg. These sources include biographical interviews, musical reviews, and recognition from established cultural critics.
I’ve also ensured consistent formatting and resolved earlier citation issues (including fixing the duplicate "Walla2012" reference).
If possible, could you please clarify what’s still missing to meet the notability threshold for music-related topics? If a second opinion would help, I’d also really appreciate another editor’s perspective on the current draft.
Sources 1 and 3 are dead links (tried from both a UK and US source location). Source 2 is used for the claim "She performed at the 1995 peace rally on the night of Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin's assassination" but the source is about "French sex poll: Sarkozy voters are boring in bed" (rough translation). The other sources do not give enough to locate: what are "Irit Shendal" Haaretz and Mako (I presume mako.co.il), and only one has a full date the other just some time in a 2008 and 2011. Most of the rest of the information is also unsourced. KylieTastic (talk) 23:28, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Fails WP:MUSICBIO - Spotify, MusicBrainz, Discogs, Bandcamp, and IMDb are not acceptable or reliable secondary sources. The individual's website is a primary source and therefore not independent.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Emily Karpel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
