User talk:Berocca Addict

Berocca Addict, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

The

Adventure

Hi Berocca Addict!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:31, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dunamaise Arts Centre moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Dunamaise Arts Centre, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Giraffer ^{(talk·contribs)} 16:09, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Dunamaise Arts Centre

Hello, Berocca Addict. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dunamaise Arts Centre, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Henry Hanna

Hiya. I noted the link to the Henry Hanna article (from the Copley Street riot title). I found it interesting as, in honesty, I'd "gone looking" for an article on Hanna (after noting his name on the Copley Street article) and hadn't found one. Unlike yourself, I hadn't taken the time to create one. Good on you for taking the time. I had a couple of quick thoughts. Which are intended to be helpful/collegiate. And I hope you take them that way :) In short:

ENGVAR/DATEVAR. You may well be "on the other side of the Atlantic" yourself. But, per MOS:ENGVAR and MOS:DATEVAR, when the topic is related to Ireland, then we use the date formats (and spellings) used in Ireland. Date first. 15 April 1916. Not month first. April 15, 1916. Also "neighbour". Not "neighbor". Etc. We also don't link dates. Regardless. Per MOS:DATELINK
ATTRIBUTEPOV/NPOV. Per WP:NPOV, article content should be neutral. And, where an opinion IS expressed, it should be attributed to someone. Someone may consider Hanna's family to be "distinguished". Or his titles "prestigious". Or his efforts "diligent". Or his writing "eloquent". But Wikipedia has no opinion on the matter. (I note that the sources, like the Belfast Newsletter obit, does not describe his family as "distinguished". Or his status of "silk [barrister]" as "prestigious". Or anything like it. So I don't know why we are adding editorial flourishes that are not in the sources.) Whose opinions are these? If they are yours, please consider removing them.
EDITORIAL. Per MOS:EDITORIAL, we shouldn't editorialise with terms like "notably" or similar. Also, if someone is "well known" then that's why we have an article on them. If they weren't well-known, we wouldn't have an article in the first place :) (In short, there should be no need - an intro - to describe someone as "famous" or "notable" or similar. It's a little redundant. Like describing Einstein as a "well known scientist". Or whatever...)
VER. Ideally, per WP:VER, text would be supported by inline citations. The (editorial) statement, that "His personal experiences were intertwined with the unfolding events in his neighbourhood", doesn't appear to be in the linked sources. Where does this come from? And why do we need it? If its not in the refs, what's it doing there? What does it add? (Other than MOS:OP-ED overtones?)

Anyway, just some random thoughts. All the best. Guliolopez (talk) 20:12, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

White Flight in Gary moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to White Flight in Gary. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it consists of machine-generated text and cites unreliable sources like arxiv and Wikipedia. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 13:58, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - I wasn't aware that arxiv wasn't considered reliable. I've changed that. I've the other offending references and re-published. Maybe use that talk page before completely deleting it again ? Berocca Addict (talk) 14:48, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Victor Bewley

Hello, Berocca Addict,

Thank you for creating Victor Bewley.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please add WP:RELIABLE sources that verifies what is presented in the article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Agent VII}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Agent 007 (talk) 16:22, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

How would notability be satisfactorily ascertained ? Berocca Addict (talk) 16:46, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]