User talk:Bam123456

Bam123456, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Bam123456! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 21 June 2020 (UTC)


Your submission at Articles for creation: IThena (September 9)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nightenbelle was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Many of the sources are primary/thesis. We require that the subject be sourced with reliable secondary sources to establish notability.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Nightenbelle (talk) 20:07, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: IThena (September 28)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Davidwr was:
The original version appears to be a copy of another web site. Fortunately, the content of that web site is licensed under the Creative Commons 4.0 license, so we can use it here. However, based on the username of the editor on that site who created it, it appears to have been written by someone with a close connection to the project. Since Wikipedia is not meant to be an advertising medium, I recommend totally rewriting it from scratch, possibly keeping some of the more useful references. BEFORE doing that, however, please read WP:Notability and WP:WEB and do an honest self-assessment about the notability of this topic. Not all software projects are notable. Not all web sites are notable. Not all BOINC projects are notable. Perhaps SOME of this content could be useful in existing articles about BOINC. Please do not re-submit until you have 1) done a sober assessment of the project's notability, 2) put 3-5 references on the talk page that, collectively, would convinced an experienced reviewer that the TOPIC is notable, and 3) rewrite the content from scratch, preferably making it shorter and free of any promotional tone. If you would like to {{ping}} me after step 2 and ask for an evaluation of the topic's "notability," just put {{ping|davidwr}} along with 3-5 references on the talk page of this article.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 01:20, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: IThena (May 28)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Nightenbelle were:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Sources are almost all primary or social media. Also is way to promotional.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Nightenbelle (talk) 14:35, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Notice

The article Cyber-Complex Foundation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:24, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cyber-Complex Foundation for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cyber-Complex Foundation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyber-Complex Foundation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:12, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: IThena (February 22)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Slywriter was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
As most of the references are primary, please identify WP:THREE that are independent secondary sources
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Slywriter (talk) 17:21, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: IThena (August 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
As has already been requested: As most of the references are primary, please identify WP:THREE that are independent secondary sources
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Stuartyeates (talk) 20:18, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:IThena

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Bam123456. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:IThena, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:37, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:IThena

[edit]

Hello, Bam123456. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "IThena".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:16, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:IThena

[edit]

Hello, Bam123456. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "IThena".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:36, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]