User talk:Badbluebus

Nomination of S. J. Dahlstrom for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article S. J. Dahlstrom is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S. J. Dahlstrom until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

J. P. Fridrich (talk) 07:34, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Typo you may want to address

Over at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anne Paulk, you noted that she is only covered in reliable sources for her hole, and while I can think of some people that may apply to, you likely meant "role". If so, you may want to correct it so it doesn't look problematic. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 19:59, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected. Thank you for making me aware of that. Badbluebus (talk) 21:15, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Sinhgad Technical Education Society

The page Sinhgad Technical Education Society has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:06, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

SK2242 (talk) 20:38, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

March 2025

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! ~ L 🌸 (talk) 02:28, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Trevor Hoppe

Hello, Badbluebus

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username ToadetteEdit, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Trevor Hoppe, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|ToadetteEdit}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

ToadetteEdit (talk) 17:03, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kein Täter Werden moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Kein Täter Werden. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because What is this article about? Not enough here for a reader to make sense of it.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:49, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Huot Hak

Hello, Badbluebus. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Huot Hak, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:06, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Huot Hak

Hello, Badbluebus. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Huot Hak".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:02, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]