User talk:Arnav Bhate

This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Arnav_Bhate.

Archives

Index 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be auto-archived by if there are more than 5.

Hounding

You have made several bad-faith comments in the discussion at Talk:Disney Star. This last one is the final that I believe editors should have to deal with. You started the discussion, not allow it to run without hounding voters. CNMall41 (talk) 17:29, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@CNMall41: I only said that because of your refusal to state any objection other than "it's disruptive", "it's been discussed" etc. In fact that is how you started the discussion. In the time you have spent arguing with me you could have actually made an argument against my table of sources. You can see that I did not say anything against Vestrian, because they simply asked for more evidence, which I have given. You could have done the same and avoided the argument - which you started by calling me disruptive. Arnav Bhate (talk • contribs) 17:34, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I never said you were disruptive. I said the discussions were becoming disruptive as Wikipedia is not Disney or Reliance's re-branding tool. As far as why you said why you said, I don't really care. You need to calm down and engage in civil discussion. Acting the way you are is unlikely going to persuade anyone of your contention and likely wind up at ANI. Do as you will but would hope you are able to relax and simply present your contention without poking at those who oppose it. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:38, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My first comment was "Please make policy based arguments for why the evidence I have given should not be considered, just like I have. Also, WP:CCC, the last RM was in February, and it was a procedural close. The last proper RM was in November, right after the rebrand." I think that was pretty civil. Then you accused me of not getting it. Arnav Bhate (talk • contribs) 17:40, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you asked for a speedy close, without considering the table at all. Arnav Bhate (talk • contribs) 17:41, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I see there is no use engaging here. Just letting you know where I am as far as the hounding. I would again request you be civil to those who's contentions do not match yours. Cheers. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:50, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Arnav, what you are advocating for is not supported by the sources because Disney Star was not renamed to JioStar. Disney Star merged with Viacom18 to form JioStar, which I have explained at the discussion, but you seem to be ignoring that evidence. There is probably a good reason why sources do not prefer Disney Star over JioStar: because they are different entities and not mutually exclusive. It seems you are failing to get the point being presented to you. Editors have cast their !votes opposing your proposal, and no amount of attempts to WP:BLUDGEON the process will change the opinions of others to your preference. — Trailblazer¹⁰¹🔥^{(discuss · contribs)} 21:35, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Following me to another discussion is a clear indication that you do not get it. Please stop or we will need to go back to ANI.--CNMall41 (talk) 18:03, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss the content instead of the proposer, I have been entirely civil with you since the ANI. There is no interaction ban between us, and I am permitted to edit the same articles as you. I am doing so, civilly. Arnav Bhate (talk • contribs) 18:16, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are now officially stalking since you continue to do so after being warned. Do it again and there will be a request for interaction ban and likely a block altogether. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:34, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That article is linked from the main ZEE article. Am I not allowed to edit articles you have touched before? Arnav Bhate (talk • contribs) 18:39, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You must be kidding asking that question but I will WP:AGF that you want an honest answer. Anyone can edit Wikipedia. But, when you make accusations about an editor, take them to ANI, get reprimanded at ANI for doing such, then go right to editing the pages of that editor, it is pretty clear you are not just "editing articles [I] have touched before." You are doing so as retaliation. So again, I am warning you to drop the stick with Zee. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:43, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Zee is an article I have edited before, too. You don't own that page. See my numerous edits to other pages during this interval, you are no longer being civil with me by casting aspersions. Arnav Bhate (talk • contribs) 18:52, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am not casting aspersions. Those are done without evidence. I am making a direct accusation with proof which will be taken to ANI if you persist. I do not wish it to come to that but it is getting to the point (based on the stalking and your continued bludgeoning on the Disney talk page) where you seem to be WP:NOTHERE. I am not going to waste another day of arguing with you. If it persists, I will go right to ANI as this has taken away the enjoyment of editing Wikipedia at this point. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:56, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have not responded to you on the Disney Star talk page. I had a productive discussion with another editor on how to settle a disagreement between us, and that discussion is now over. Arnav Bhate (talk • contribs) 19:00, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Regd Indigo page

Hey I noticed an anamoly in the Indigo page in the Logo and livery section. The secondary livery img used here (is it officially the second livery or just a pre-livery white plane which was captured and put as secondary livery here). I think it's the later and Indigo has only 1 type of livery. Also the source 59 of reddif attached to secondary livery has no mention of the facts that are written here citing it. Check it out. I think we should remove it from here. Like that even Spicejet has makeshift livery of older Jet Airways planes, we don't count that right as it'll be painted to Spicejet livery soon. Same should be the case for here. Thanks Editking100 (talk) 20:22, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You can make changes as per required, if you too get my point above. Thanks Editking100 (talk) 22:58, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Page name

Please move below page titles to new names.

2409:40C0:19:5043:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 12:00, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please use WP:RM/TR. Arnav Bhate (talk • contribs) 14:07, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Air India fleet

Hello, I noticed that you reverted my rework of the Air India fleet article. Please keep in mind that only repeated sources were removed as citations, countless formatting errors were cleaned up and the reworked table better reflects current reality than the previously existing information. The undo has returned the article to a far worse state, and I would appreciate the edit being restored. Thank you. Lhxmilton (talk) 11:04, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Lhxmilton: What you should do is read sources linked in articles. And cite new ones while making changes like you did. Wikipedia follows a policy of WP:No original research. The article does not contain repeated sources. If you see the same source cited multiple times, it isn't, you would find the source only once in the references section. Statements need to have sources next to them, so it can look like the source has been included more than once even when it hasn't. Your changes to the table made it worse because they remove reliably cited information and replace it with original research and presented it in a weird format not expected in tables. Arnav Bhate (talk • contribs) 11:43, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Air India fleet, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. If something wasn't sourced before, that's not an excuse for not providing a source when you change it. If you disagree with it not being sourced in the first place (which I'm on board with), then we can either source it or remove it. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 17:25, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The livery section, the source is flightradar, but it is not mentioned on flightradar, and from the photos on flightradar, it is clear it is not a special livery. Arnav Bhate (talk • contribs) 18:21, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yet again, you've removed a sourced, and changed four sets of figures without adding a source or citing an existing source. I haven't reverted yet because You told me to wait, and I'm holding off in case you do add a source... but if that isn't forthcoming, then back it goes. If you say you got the information on FlightRadar - then where is that source? Danners430 _{tweaks made} 18:22, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Air India source about widebody retrofits is the source. I am saying the the flightradar source that I removed was not supporting the information it was next to. Arnav Bhate (talk • contribs) 18:40, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This Air India source is already in the article. Arnav Bhate (talk • contribs) 18:41, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What air india source? If the source is already in the article, use named references and add it to the content you're using it to verify! Danners430 _{tweaks made} 18:41, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]