User talk:AquilatorG10

Please make sure to follow the talk page guidelines and Wikipedia's policies and guidelines before making any topic.
AquilatorG10 hates trolling and other disruptive behavior, so having these here is unwelcome in his viewpoint.
If a violation of any kind occured, please remove it immediately.

This user is busy in real life due to him being in the Central European Summer Time (CEST) time zone and therefore at school from 6:30 UTC to 11:30 UTC and may not respond swiftly to queries.

September 2025

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. You can learn which sources Wikipedia considers reliable at WP:Reliable sources and find out how to add the sources at Help:Referencing for beginners. Thank you. _signed,Willondon (talk) 13:17, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

you cant add fringe theories to wikipedia? AquilatorG10 Talk Contribs 14:03, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is with your sourcing [1]. I question its reliability in this situation; from CGAA FAQ: "Q. What topics does CGAA cover? A. Our topics include insurance, investment, banking, credit, and finance." So I don't know why they're answering questions about the end of the world in 2027. Which brings us to a bigger problem. The article you edited is about Last Judgment, a concept found across the Abrahamic religions. The source you gave mentions nothing about final judgement, only about the end of the world, which are not the same thing at all. _signed,Willondon (talk) 14:24, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

sorry, thought they were the same thing. AquilatorG10 Talk Contribs 13:53, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Seaon D'Souza

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Seaon D'Souza requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Agent 007 (talk) 17:08, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

it's a stub. AquilatorG10 Talk Contribs 17:09, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Emoji Movie

The Emoji Movie has been discussed at least twelve times on Talk:List of films considered the worst and there has never been consensus to include it because sufficient sources have not been presented. The three sources you presented are definitely insufficient: low scores on Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes do not meet the inclusion criteria; we need multiple high-quality sources that specifically say that the movie is one of the worst ever made. An audience rating is irrelevant, but even if it were, a rating of B is not very low. If you think you have found good sources that support the inclusion criteria, please open a discussion on the article talk page and present them. Unfortunately, editors watching this page are pretty exasperated with people adding this movie to the page with poor quality sources, since it has happened many times. CodeTalker (talk) 17:25, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

sorry i wony add it again, despite people saying it's one of the worst movies ever AquilatorG10 Talk Contribs 17:29, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Random people saying it's one of the worst movies ever is irrelevant. But if you can find reputable sources that say that, it would be support for adding it to the list. CodeTalker (talk) 17:40, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i just said i wont add it again. AquilatorG10 Talk Contribs 17:41, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"99 Nights in the Forest" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect 99 Nights in the Forest has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 September 25 § 99 Nights in the Forest until a consensus is reached. λ NegativeMP1 17:28, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Brookhaven RP redirects to List of Roblox games because its a roblox game and so is this redirect for the same reason, so why shouldnt this redirect be kept AquilatorG10 Talk Contribs 17:30, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Add a verified page about Amin Atef with references

A tag has been placed on Draft:Add a verified page about Amin Atef with references requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Unnecessary redirect

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Felicia (talk) 18:38, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note, you can just ignore this message. Felicia (talk) 18:48, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

sorry, i moved that page to Draft:Amin Atef and i couldn't move without leaving a redirect AquilatorG10 Talk Contribs 18:53, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That is understandable. If I was an admin, I would of deleted it myself. Felicia (talk) 19:10, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

Hello, AquilatorG10,

Do not put personal information about a minor editor (under 18 years of age) on a very visible, popular noticeboard. I had to revision delete all of the content. Bring your concerns to an admin's user talk page or go to Oversighters and mail in this information. Thank you and please do not repost this information. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:18, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

sorry, i wont do that again, i was just confused if editing wikipedia while being a mimor is allowed AquilatorG10 Talk Contribs 07:19, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Technically no but if your edits lets other editors know that you are minor the edits probably needs to be revdel anyways so it doesnt really matter. Does that answer your question? Trade (talk) 07:24, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz Several edits still need to be revdeled. this and this. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) 07:40, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i was reporting them because i was just confused if editing wikipedia while being a mimor is allowed AquilatorG10 Talk Contribs 07:27, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You could have asked without linking to the edit Trade (talk) 07:52, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And for the future. If you see any edits that violates someones privacy or is otherwise defamatory please just email an administrator instead of posting it on ANI. --Trade (talk) 07:55, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. AquilatorG10 Talk Contribs 08:10, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Now see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Hide revision AquilatorG10 Talk Contribs 09:40, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:47, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed to Azler99, not to mention blatant logged-out trolling.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:50, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AquilatorG10 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am actually Your Local Italian's brother. We live in the same house so we share the same IP address, i swear im not Your Local Italian. Oh, and the "blatant logged-out trolling" was done by Your Local Italian, who knew my password and decided to vandalize while logged out and then log into my account. I'm very ashamed of his vandalism.

Decline reason:

This approach never works. See WP:LITTLEBROTHER. Yamla (talk) 11:07, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.