User talk:AlphaOmega999

Hello everyone.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vajra Realm Mandala (September 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vajra Realm Mandala and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 06:35, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AlphaOmega999! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari Scribe^Edits! Talk! 06:35, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My old account

I have an old Wiki account : Alphone, it seems that my old mailbox cannot receive any email from Wikipedia, therefore I am unable to regain access to my old Wiki account. AlphaOmega999 (talk) 02:24, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

October 2025

Hello, I'm SnowyRiver28. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Tao have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. Take a look at our guidelines about external links. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SnowyRiver28 (talk) 03:59, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, if you think some external links are inappropriate, you can just remove the links, rather than deleting all contents I wrote. Can you keep the contents, but just remove the links that you consider inappropriate ? AlphaOmega999 (talk) 04:05, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Remsense. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that in one of your recent contributions to Tao, you cited a link to a source that may not be reliable. Sources considered unreliable should generally not be used to support statements. Information from an unreliable source can be challenged by other editors and removed. Reliable sources are generally those with a reputation for fact-checking and editorial oversight. Self-published material, user-generated content, and certain other outlets such as blogs, wikis, personal websites, and websites or publications with a poor reputation for fact-checking may not meet these standards. If you are unsure about which sources are appropriate, there is a list of sources that are considered generally reliable. Additionally, some WikiProjects have their own lists of sources that are considered reliable for that particular subtopic. If you are still unsure about a source's reliability, you can ask at the reliable sources noticeboard. Please see Wikipedia:Reliable sources, Wikipedia:Verifiability#Self-published sources, Wikipedia:No original research#Primary, secondary and tertiary sources, as well as Wikipedia:Do not include the full text of lengthy primary sources. Remsense 🌈 论 08:25, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, can you just remove the link to the blog, but keep other contents ? Many Wikipedia articles do allow citations, if you think there are too many citations, can we keep two three citations like this version:

Tao: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia AlphaOmega999 (talk) 08:29, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! SnowyRiver28 (talk) 09:43, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]