User talk:1995hoo
 Archives |
|---|
SPI re: the Utah NHL sockpuppeteer
[edit]Tagged you in the evidence itself, but figured I'd let you know here I've opened an SPI regarding Joseph507357 and the two IPs. The Kip (contribs) 04:58, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Spelling out numbers
[edit]Sorry about that, I was taught to spell out numbers less than 10, but above numerals are okay. Red Jay (talk) 18:14, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
olympics comparison
[edit]In the olympics in los angeles they called it football on the article and on the us and canada at the olympics pages they use both like football (soccer), why cant we say soccer (football) on the first mention? Mwiqdoh (talk) 12:47, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Background colors on team tables
[edit]I note that in May you removed the background colors from the teams table on the NFL page because they appeared to violate MOS:COLORCODING. Personally, I think that the colors made the table easier to decipher, but I understand the reasoning behind the MOS. I also note that the CFL, MLB, NBA, and WNBA pages use background colors too. In your opinion, should they be changed as well? Also, do you know of a broad sports related discussion group that this question could be posed to for others opinions as well? Assadzadeh (talk) 01:47, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
Message to 1995hoo
[edit]Sir, mach 1,7 equals 2099 km/h. If you don’t believe me, you can check it on the internet. I’m sorry to say but you are giving the wrong information about the speed of boom overture. واھید۱۲۳ (talk) 09:46, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
Mission: Impossible
[edit]Greetings,
Cool to find another M:I fan. When Dead Reckoning was released, I hadn't seen any, so I watched them in order, 1-6, and then proceeded to the theater.
YouTube Premium offered me M:I 5 for free, so I have decided to watch the back catalog over again, except out of order, and starting with only odd-numbered installments. So it will go [roughly] 5 → 1 → 3 → 7 → 6 → 2 → 4 → 8.
The last time I was watching M:I at home, a neighbor's smoke alarm sounded, and I decided to call 9-1-1, followed their instructions, which included banging on the front window and shouting at 10pm, and lastly I pulled the switch on the all-building fire alarm klaxon. I awakened 100 other families, but I am not Ethan Hunt. 2600:8800:1E8F:BE00:2E86:C85A:8B38:362D (talk) 10:50, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
Mistake
[edit]Mb about the club world cup. Sorry about that. Hope it didnt cause too much frustration. Thx for letting me know and have a great rest of your week. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.221.72.238 (talk) 22:17, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Concorde
[edit]I understand there is a tradition of referring to "Concorde" rather than "the Concorde" (as we do in the US), but then is it correct to refer to the plural Concordes? As in, tyre failures have been a "problem for Concordes"? Or should that be a "problem for Concorde"? It's a minute detail, I know, but I always want to be careful when editing a GA article. Thanks - Dcs002 (talk) 06:04, 19 August 2025 (UTC) Edit: The specific example is "57 incidents of tyre failure involving Concordes" as opposed to "57 incidents of tyre failure involving Concorde". Dcs002 (talk) 06:09, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
- I think either of those is probably right, although I'm also American so I'm not 100% certain. If you search the existing article, you'll see the word "Concordes" appears eight times. It's certainly the correct plural form. My gut feeling as to the sentence you raise is that it probably depends on whether the issue was a problem for the aircraft type in general (in which case "Concorde" is probably correct) or whether it refers to specific ones such as the ones mentioned as having suffered blowouts (in which case "Concordes" is probably correct). I defer to others' judgment on that issue. 1995hoo (talk) 12:46, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
SoFi Stadium
[edit]Hi there, I have no real insight into what's been going on at the SoFi Stadium article, but I did also restore an older version recently, which I believed got rid of the vandalism. I also did a lot of copy editing of various errors, which have now been put back in, with your recent reversion.
I'm totally happy to work with you on this, and restore the page to its best version - what portion of the article did you think was fan vandalism? Was it the "Levi's South" business? Thanks, Jessicapierce (talk) 21:59, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Jessicapierce: It was indeed the "Levi's South" stuff that promoted me to look at the article history, although when I was going back through the diffs there was other junk in there that made me revert further back—the usual crap you see on sports-related pages like changing the "Owner" field to "San Francisco 49ers." So i was trying to avoid reverting to a version that had that sort of thing. (Full disclosure: I’m a Redskin fan, which is what promoted me to look at the SoFi article because they're playing the Chargers as I type this.) My diff now shows that some gone perfectly good changes got swept up in the reversion. I can try to go back through later and fix those. Not right now, though, because I need to start getting dinner ready! 1995hoo (talk) 22:05, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
- Makes sense, thank you! This is not at all my area of expertise, so I'm glad you knew what to look for. I would appreciate it if you'd reinstitute those fixes, but I don't think any of it was super important - just punctuation and style fixes. Thanks for the reply! Cheers, Jessicapierce (talk) 22:08, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 18 November 2025 (UTC)