User talk:16dvnk
| This is 16dvnk's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Knowledge cutoff (July 15)
[edit]
- Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
- Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
- Essay-like writing
- Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
- Close paraphrasing
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Knowledge cutoff and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, 16dvnk!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 10:28, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Knowledge cutoff has been accepted
[edit]
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 4% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's "Did you know" section.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
TurboSuperA+(connect) 12:20, 15 July 2025 (UTC)Your nomination of Knowledge cutoff is under review
[edit]Your good article nomination of the article Knowledge cutoff is
under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein (talk) 00:25, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
Your nomination of Knowledge cutoff has failed
[edit]Your good article nomination of the article Knowledge cutoff has
failed. See the review page for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein (talk) 00:47, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
Your nomination of Knowledge cutoff has failed
[edit]Your good article nomination of the article Knowledge cutoff has
failed. See the review page for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grapesurgeon -- Grapesurgeon (talk) 18:07, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hello! 16dvnk,
you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 05:51, 12 August 2025 (UTC)
|
Your nomination of Knowledge cutoff has failed
[edit]Your good article nomination of the article Knowledge cutoff has
failed. See the review page for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of RoySmith -- RoySmith (talk) 19:04, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
