User talk:1250metersdeep

Archives

Vandalism

@1250metersdeep, you vandalized my user page. The Admins are coming. PhilDaBirdMan (Talk |WikiProject Socialism | Current Incubator Initiative) 18:12, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

shiver me timbers 🥶 — 𝟷.𝟸𝟻𝚔𝚖 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔) 18:13, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Actually yes. This edit was completely unacceptable. Since you have a history of disruptive edits, and using Wikipedia to have fun instead of improving the project, you will be blocked the next time you make any edit that isn't specifically about improving the project. If you make personal attacks against other editors, as you did in that edit and make no bones about it it was a personal attack, you will be blocked. If you insert your opinion in to articles, you will be blocked. If you make any edit that another editor needs to revert, you will be blocked. If you make edits like this, you will be blocked. Canterbury Tail talk 21:52, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

1250metersdeep, I understand we are friends in real life. This does not justify edit warring or personal attacks. I am for using Wikipedia as a free resource for information, not as a sandbox for whatever chaos you want to make. PhilDaBirdMan (Talk |WikiProject Socialism | Current Incubator Initiative) 21:54, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

jfc man — 𝟷.𝟸𝟻𝚔𝚖 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔) 17:47, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Do you watch my talk page or something — 𝟷.𝟸𝟻𝚔𝚖 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔) 17:31, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes PhilDaBirdMan (Talk |WikiProject Socialism | Current Incubator Initiative) 17:41, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Was asking @Canterbury Tail — 𝟷.𝟸𝟻𝚔𝚖 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔) 17:46, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:46, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

??? — 𝟷.𝟸𝟻𝚔𝚖 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔) 18:54, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ScottishFinnishRadish i think this is a mistake. I edit from a school — 𝟷.𝟸𝟻𝚔𝚖 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔) 18:55, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Shared ip — 𝟷.𝟸𝟻𝚔𝚖 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔) 18:56, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Any other checkuser will likely come to the same conclusion I did when they review the evidence. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:57, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My friend, @Eltheralmushroom, is also on this IP (school), and the IP has very bad IP users who are mostly vandals PhilDaBirdMan (Talk |WikiProject Socialism | Current Incubator Initiative) 19:07, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

vro ima just do a Wikipedia:Clean start on my home ip or sum idk — 𝟷.𝟸𝟻𝚔𝚖 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔) 19:09, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think you missed the criteria for clean start. Canterbury Tail talk 00:57, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That’d be ban evasion, not clean start. PhilDaBirdMan (Talk |WikiProject Socialism | Current Incubator Initiative) 02:13, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No, bans and blocks, or potential upcoming ones. Canterbury Tail talk 11:48, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]